• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Battle of the Australians - Mk II

PhoenixFire

PhoenixFire

International Coach
Miller

His FC stats are incredible, enough to make him a candiate for great in either batting or bowling, let along being an all-rounder.
 
BoyBrumby

BoyBrumby

Englishman
Miller for me. Harsh on AB, but I think it's only right to favour the all-rounder when one's assessing a player's worth as a cricketer.
 
Ikki

Ikki

Hall of Fame Member
zaremba said:
Border

As a bemused onlooker (who's not read through the entire thread), can I ask why each round of comparisons is between players of different types (here, gritty batsman v extravagant all-rounder v bearded keeper)?

I struggle to see how any meaningful comparison can be made.

Anyhow Border gets my vote because I saw him play and he was bloody good.
Click to expand...
To sum it up simply and shortly:

- What they meant to their team
- What they meant to the opposition of the time
- What they meant to their discipline(s)
- What they mean to Australian cricket in the overall picture
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Top