I know what you mean.Bit of a horror last few picks for me with the Pacers I had in line for my next pick all going - I'll go with Ben Stokes next please
Himannv | ataraxia | Line and Length | AndrewB | honestbharani | ankitj | Michaelf7777777 | ||||||||||||||
Don Bradman | 99 | WG Grace | 32 | Viv Richards | 50 | 61 | Wally Hammond | 58 | 37 | Jimmy Cook | 17 | |||||||||
Andrew Flintoff | 31 | 32 | Gary Sobers | 57 | 34 | Keith Miller | 36 | 22 | Jacques Kallis | 55 | 32 | |||||||||
Shaun Pollock | 32 | 23 | Mike Procter | 25 | 15 | |||||||||||||||
Allan Donald | 10 | 22 | Ray Lindwall | 21 | 23 | Joel Garner | 12 | 20 | Dennis Lillee | 13 | 23 | Jasprit Bumrah | 2 | 21 | Fred Trueman | 13 | 21 | Shane Warne | 17 | 25 |
Michael Holding | 13 | 23 | Waqar Younis | 10 | 23 | Pat Cummins | 16 | 21 | Bill O'Reilly | 12 | 22 | Alan Davidson | 24 | 20 | ||||||
Alec Bedser | 12 | 24 | Sydney F Barnes | 8 | 16 | |||||||||||||||
97 | 164 | 159 | 113 | 99 | 194 | 194 | ||||||||||||||
Teuton | trundler | Magrat Garlick | JOJOXI | StephenZA | Pothas | Fuller Pilch | ||||||||||||||
Ricky Ponting | 51 | Sunil Gavaskar | 51 | Victor Trumper | 39 | Sachin Tendulkar | 53 | 54 | Brian Lara | 52 | Bob Simpson | 46 | 42 | |||||||
Virat Kohli | 53 | Jack Hobbs | 56 | |||||||||||||||||
Ian Botham | 33 | 28 | Aubrey Faulkner | 40 | 26 | Ben Stokes | 37 | 31 | Imran Khan | 37 | 22 | |||||||||
Kapil Dev | 31 | 29 | Jack Gregory | 36 | 31 | |||||||||||||||
Dale Steyn | 13 | 22 | Harold Larwood | 19 | 28 | Malcolm Marshall | 18 | 20 | Richard Hadlee | 27 | 22 | Muttiah Muralitharan | 11 | 22 | ||||||
Courtney Walsh | 7 | 24 | Curtly Ambrose | 12 | 20 | Richie Benaud | 24 | 27 | Wasim Akram | 22 | 23 | Glenn McGrath | 7 | 21 | Andy Roberts | 14 | 25 | |||
116 | 151 | 68 | 160 | 140 | 85 | 136 |
It's the 5 bowlers with most wickets per match.@Teuton I'm guessing it's up to us who our 5th bowler officially will be?
Well the stats qualification have been well defined, so I am guessing you mean the final batting and bowling orders (optional)? In which case yes, you will be free to arrange your xi in whatever orders you want for the vote@Teuton I'm guessing it's up to us who our 5th bowler officially will be?
Round 4 |
@trundler |
honestbharani |
StephenZA |
Round 5 |
Pothas |
StephenZA |
Himannv |
honestbharani |
Michaelf7777777 |
Teuton |
Fuller Pilch |
ataraxia |
AndrewB |
trundler |
ankitj |
JOJOXI |
Line and Length |
Magrat Garlick |
Round 6 |
Magrat Garlick |
Line and Length |
JOJOXI |
ankitj |
trundler |
AndrewB |
ataraxia |
Fuller Pilch |
Teuton |
Michaelf7777777 |
honestbharani |
Himannv |
StephenZA |
Pothas |
I'm happy either way, content with how it is currently, would be content with a change as well, perhaps a shortening of timeouts an option too, might give more certainty knowing you cannot be overtaken in first say 4/6 hours and still shorten some of longer gaps but happy either way.Also, with 14 players there does seem to be some long gaps between picks, so I am thinking of speeding it up by having 2 on the clock at any time, but will add a safety catch of needing a round to finish before the next one starts. Does anyone have any thoughts on this suggestion either for or against?