Spikey
Request Your Custom Title Now!
out of all the test playing countries, australia is the least likely option, except perhaps englandI believe its already under discussion at some level mate, whether you like it or not.
out of all the test playing countries, australia is the least likely option, except perhaps englandI believe its already under discussion at some level mate, whether you like it or not.
out of all the test playing countries, australia is the least likely option, except perhaps england
Yes. WT20 > footy codes > foreign domestic tv T20 tourney in terms of ground priorities I would guess.
They could hold the IPL using drop ins at secondary grounds I guess - genuinely, no one would go to watch it. There’s no skin in the game for locals. Australia is a crazy competitive sporting environment, and the footy codes running up to as far as December will potentially make things ver tough for cricket
Unlikely to be an October window here because football codes will be using the grounds
footy in October? Since when?Yes. WT20 > footy codes > foreign domestic tv T20 tourney in terms of ground priorities I would guess.
They could hold the IPL using drop ins at secondary grounds I guess - genuinely, no one would go to watch it. There’s no skin in the game for locals. Australia is a crazy competitive sporting environment, and the footy codes running up to as far as December will potentially make things ver tough for cricket
i heard on the radio today the nrl’s latest plan is to run through october - don’t know where the afl’s head is but i imagine it would be similar, and given they’re ostensibly smarter than the league at head office you’d think they’ll be starting later as well, so could even go laterfooty in October? Since when?
not that they would ever happen concurrently but AFL would surely get priority over cricket, even the World T20. Unless maybe it was a final or big Australia game.
CA is just like all the other sporting organisationsAs has been observed about other big sports in Oz, COVID-19 has exposed the complacent and over-indulgent sporting administrations that run them.
There have been billion dollar deals everywhere, enduring sports are servants of TV, yet all the money seems to have disappeared into thin air.
CA looks particularly culpable considering they only missed a couple of matches before this hit. Why did they take the big money to go to pay-TV when it provides no protection in a time like this?
Frankly, this all suggests CA have been derelict in their duty and a new better organisation should be created from this mes.
There is talk both footy codes may run through to as late as December, depending on when they get back up and running this year.footy in October? Since when?
not that they would ever happen concurrently but AFL would surely get priority over cricket, even the World T20. Unless maybe it was a final or big Australia game.
Jeez that James Sutherland **** has a lot to answer for. How he got to walk away when he chose with a massive bonus amidst the ruination he caused is one of the enduring sporting mysteries.But in this particular case, they had set away money only 4 years ago, close to 200M, for a rainy day. and they've pissed it away before the rainy day.
Not sure how I missed that. That could potentially decimate the cricket seasonThere is talk both footy codes may run through to as late as December, depending on when they get back up and running this year.
Yeah it's atrocious really. If it was a public company the directors would have been sacked long ago.Jeez that James Sutherland **** has a lot to answer for. How he got to walk away when he chose with a massive bonus amidst the ruination he caused is one of the enduring sporting mysteries.
I've said it before and I will say it again, it's no coincidence that pretty much everything Peever touched in his time at Jolimont St turned to pissYeah that's what I was interested in hearing from him. Should have known it'd be useless like it always is
I suspect it might be related to Edwards/Peever transition as chairman of the board. That happened around 15/16 which I think is the peak of the cash reserves, although I need to look at the reports. Change of chairman, change of philosophy perhaps? Or the CA executive team never wanted that much in reserve and took the opportunity to push the case for a different direction