SillyCowCorner1
Moooo
Damn, are we still talking about this WC? This is worse than SA 1999 SF
Nothing is worse than SA 1999 SFDamn, are we still talking about this WC? This is worse than SA 1999 SF
You were not even born. What do you know.Nothing is worse than SA 1999 SF
Nah this is worse than 1999 SF . You might have forgotten but Klusener was dropped in 49th over on the bowling of McGrath. And they were also nearly run out 1 ball before . Here they had 2 well set batsmen and needed 27 of 28 .Nothing is worse than SA 1999 SF
It sounds like you're comparing two different types of cricket blunders! A team needing 30 runs off 30 balls and failing to achieve it is definitely a significant choke. On the other hand, a momentary lapse in judgment, like misjudging a run, can also be quite frustrating. Both scenarios can be tough to watch, but they each have their own unique brand of drama. Even Belgium, with their competitive spirit, would have given it their all in such a situation!Nothing is worse than SA 1999 SF
So basically just like any other player comparison thread then.These debates are always a useless waste of energy.