Yeah I hold a similar view as well. Its all a bit sus, and it really is hard to accept the weight management excuse.BoyBrumby said:WRT Warne I personally think the circumstantial evidence is pretty damning. The chain of events goes something like:
-Warne dislocates shoulder before World Cup that he has already said will be his swansong in ODIs & puts his participation in real doubt
-?
-Warne makes quicker than expected recovery from dislocated shoulder & is able to take part in World Cup
-Warne ingests diuretic
-Warne pinged for said diuretic
Now the "?" may or may not have involved taking something like an anabolic steroid that is known to speed recovery, but frankly I find it rather more plausible than the whole "wanting to look slim on telly" excuse. For mine potentially the only thing that separates Warne from Asif & Ahktar is the efficacy of his masking agent, which is why I'd advocate a similar ban.
Yes.silentstriker said:Should I be scared that I actually laughed at Turbinator's post?
Warne unlike the Pakistan team, is tested any number of times during the year. I know he is not the brightest player ever, but surely he would have known that he would have been caught for a masking, or steroid offence sooner rather then later.Scaly piscine said:You can't treat a masking agent and a steroid differently. Intent or long-term usage cannot be proven in people taking illegal drugs, for all we know the steroid was a one off for Asif and Warne had been taking a masked steroid or whatever for months and had done it before and so Warne was far worse. If we give weaker punishment for masking agents then cheats are obviously going to take masking agents so they'd get a weaker ban if they got caught. It is unfair to presume that Asif deliberately took a steroid to aid his return from injury and then not presume Warne took a steroid or whatever that was masked, both should be presumed as they would be in most other sports bodies covering doping offenses. Obviously if Asif proved someone maliciously spiked his drink or whatever then it would be different, but in all likelihood it'll be unproven whether Asif took the steroid deliberately, same with practically everyone ever caught.
It's up to PCB because it was out of competitionTim said:If they are found guilty, then there is no doubt that both have to receive 2 years. The ICC has got to step up to the plate and show every other player that they won't tolerate drugs otherwise they will be setting a lenient prescedent. Which wouldn't surprise me considering how hopeless they usually are.
that is seriously ridiculous. If they did take performance enhancing drugs on purpose, then they deserve all kinds of ban and more. But you are jumping the gun way too early here... It is almost like kicking a person in the nuts when he is down. For all we know, it may have been taken to recover faster from an injury. Still deserves punishments and bans, but it is not like cheating and therefore ruining the name of your country.Neil Pickup said:How often do B samples turn out negative? It doesn't look good.
I wonder if we'll see the same 'national honour' lines of argument being trotted out any time soon?
That's the main reason it's taken by sportsmen and women isn't it? I severely doubt Asif and Aktar have osteporosis or breast cancer.honestbharani said:that is seriously ridiculous. If they did take performance enhancing drugs on purpose, then they deserve all kinds of ban and more. But you are jumping the gun way too early here... It is almost like kicking a person in the nuts when he is down. For all we know, it may have been taken to recover faster from an injury. Still deserves punishments and bans, but it is not like cheating and therefore ruining the name of your country.
Heck, it may have even been Warne's mum who told them to take this so that they can get slim.
The next person who uses that gets their head done in.honestbharani said:Heck, it may have even been Warne's mum who told them to take this so that they can get slim.
No - its exactly like cheating. I don't think the "I'm only taking it to get over an injury" rationale is any different from "I want to get bigger muscles". Both aims are the same - you're introducing unnatural chemicals, or unnatural levels of naturally occuring chemicals, into your body to produce an unnatural result. Its the very definition of cheating - you're attempting to procure an unfair advantage over your competitors. It disadvantages people who aren't willing to break the rules to aid their recovery - and those people have every right to want to adhere to the rules as nobody knows what the long term effects of this stuff is. I'm afraid the 'it was only to get back in time for the CT' excuse is just a rationalisation.honestbharani said:that is seriously ridiculous. If they did take performance enhancing drugs on purpose, then they deserve all kinds of ban and more. But you are jumping the gun way too early here... It is almost like kicking a person in the nuts when he is down. For all we know, it may have been taken to recover faster from an injury. Still deserves punishments and bans, but it is not like cheating and therefore ruining the name of your country.
Heck, it may have even been Warne's mum who told them to take this so that they can get slim.
Completely agreed.Matt79 said:No - its exactly like cheating. I don't think the "I'm only taking it to get over an injury" rationale is any different from "I want to get bigger muscles". Both aims are the same - you're introducing unnatural chemicals, or unnatural levels of naturally occuring chemicals, into your body to produce an unnatural result. Its the very definition of cheating - you're attempting to procure an unfair advantage over your competitors. It disadvantages people who aren't willing to break the rules to aid their recovery - and those people have every right to want to adhere to the rules as nobody knows what the long term effects of this stuff is. I'm afraid the 'it was only to get back in time for the CT' excuse is just a rationalisation.
And I did the Warney's mum bit 4 pages ago!