• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Archived [18/10/06] : Battrick

Status
Not open for further replies.

PY

International Coach
dontcloseyoureyes said:
Someone give me $5000000 so I can buy this guy.
:laugh:

BT rating of 146,000 is absurd.

And if it's a must-win then I'd go PAN Trev. What are your fixtures like after that?
 

trevor_vayro

U19 Vice-Captain
I kind'a say it's a must win, because it's one of the few games I know for sure that I can win, and I figure that if I'm to keep out of playoff trouble, then I need to win all the bankers. But on the other hand, I did want to TIE because my next three games after Friday are against sides better than me, but not so much so that I wouldn't stand a chance against them on GFI. Take for example West Reading, with ratings in their last game of Prof/Resp/abs - Resp/Use/Med, as opposed to my recent TIE ratings of Comp/Comp/Abs - Comp/Med/Feeb. Anyway, I'd figured that if I could TIE three in a row, then I'd have enough in the tank to GFI three in a row. Last time around I beat one of these three and lost to the others. But looking at it realistically I don't suppose there's much point in gambling on beating a team better than me if I don't even put away the teams who are worse than me! I guess there's the same sort of difference between Urwenda, my Friday opponents, and me, as there is between me and West Reading, so logically, if I stand a chance of catching West Reading if I GFI, then Urwenda stand a chance of catching me if I TIE against them?

Oh Yes, and a big thank you to the top blokes at Battrick. Me and a couple of my mates who play are all blind to various degrees, and the new ticker thing Battrick introduced on Monday, which refreshed the page every minute, was playing holy F**k with the speech synthesising software which reads the screen for us. But one E-mail to the GM, and Battrick agreed to take the ticker off until they can think of a way of stopping it from interfering with our screen-readers! So if anyone from Battrick reads this, then thank you very very much, and to anyone who liked the ticker, and wondered where it had gone - Um…Sorry, it was my fault!!

Later, Trev
 

PY

International Coach
I see what you mean about the TIE situation. I'd probably go for the PAN and then PAN one of the games you were going to GFI (against the worst team obviously).

Man, that's awesome that you can read all the things we say using software! Does it read our posts for you?

And I don't think the ticker really adds anything to the game though I could be wrong.
 
Last edited:

trevor_vayro

U19 Vice-Captain
Oh yes! Not only does my computer read me all your posts, it also reads them, as well as everything I write back, in the same mechanised voice as used by Britain's favourite brain-box Stephen Hawkin.

I must confess, in my more bored and immature moments, I have succumbed to the temptation to have a bit of fun with my computer! - Well why wouldn't Stephen Hawkin ring NHS Direct and describe his symptoms as absolute quadriplegia and a silly mechanised voice? And why wouldn't Stephen Hawkin ring up to order a pizza? or a taxi? or to buy flowers from Inter-Flora for Timmy from South Park? The best bit is the bemusement I get from the people on the other end of the phone. They're 99% certain it's a p**s take, but they can't quite bring themselves to tell you to get stuffed, as there's always that 0.1% chance that it really is Stephen Hawkin - Because let's face it, it's not everyone who has Stephen Hawkin's voice ready programmed into their laptop!

I used to work as a reporter on a radio station which shall remain nameless, mainly because I still work for the same media organisation, and I plugged my laptop into the mixing desk and recorded while I typed the following trail:

"Hello, My Name is Stephen Hawkin, and I'm the most intelligent man in the world! That's why I listen to blarblar sports show on *** Radio, every Saturday from 1:30."

Funnily enough my producer didn't want to use it! Well thanks for all the advice today guys, I'm off to submit my orders for Friday, as I'm not in the office tomorrow. Take care and talk soon,

Later, Trev
 

cricketboy29

International Regular
Would you recommend any nets for these guys?

Chinmay Sagren - 17 yo, BT Rating=2,197
RH Batsman, RH Spin Bowler, respectable batting form, competent bowling form, invigorated
A steady player with feeble leadership skills and abysmal experience.
Stamina: worthless Wicket Keeping: worthless
Batting: mediocre Concentration: woeful
Bowling: mediocre Consistency: woeful
Fielding: worthless

Prasanna Karthikeyan - 17 yo, BT Rating=2,508
RH Batsman, RH Spin Bowler, abysmal batting form, superb bowling form, sublime
A defensive player with worthless leadership skills and worthless experience.
Stamina: woeful Wicket Keeping: abysmal
Batting: competent Concentration: worthless
Bowling: mediocre Consistency: worthless
Fielding: abysmal
For this guy, how come his conc and cons havent popped?, his batting has popped once, and his bowling once. But his seconds still remain worthless.

Shreyas Govender - 17 yo, BT Rating=2,228
RH Batsman, RH Spin Bowler, respectable batting form, respectable bowling form, fresh
A destructive player with mediocre leadership skills and abysmal experience.
Stamina: worthless Wicket Keeping: worthless
Batting: respectable Concentration: abysmal
Bowling: worthless Consistency: worthless
Fielding: worthless
 
Last edited:

roseboy64

Cricket Web Content Updater
cricketboy29 said:
Would you recommend any nets for these guys?

Chinmay Sagren - 17 yo, BT Rating=2,197
RH Batsman, RH Spin Bowler, respectable batting form, competent bowling form, invigorated
A steady player with feeble leadership skills and abysmal experience.
Stamina: worthless Wicket Keeping: worthless
Batting: mediocre Concentration: woeful
Bowling: mediocre Consistency: woeful
Fielding: worthless

Prasanna Karthikeyan - 17 yo, BT Rating=2,508
RH Batsman, RH Spin Bowler, abysmal batting form, superb bowling form, sublime
A defensive player with worthless leadership skills and worthless experience.
Stamina: woeful Wicket Keeping: abysmal
Batting: competent Concentration: worthless
Bowling: mediocre Consistency: worthless
Fielding: abysmal
For this guy, how come his conc and cons havent popped?, his batting has popped once, and his bowling once. But his seconds still remain worthless.
Shreyas Govender - 17 yo, BT Rating=2,228
RH Batsman, RH Spin Bowler, respectable batting form, respectable bowling form, fresh
A destructive player with mediocre leadership skills and abysmal experience.
Stamina: worthless Wicket Keeping: worthless
Batting: respectable Concentration: abysmal
Bowling: worthless Consistency: worthless
Fielding: worthless
Fielding nets make them pop faster I think. Anyway, I'd give one of the first two nets and maybe give the last one a fielding net. Depends on what you want I'd say.
 

Adamc

Cricketer Of The Year
cricketboy29 said:
Would you recommend any nets for these guys?
The problem with those guys is that they all need to be trained in everything, i.e. primary, secondaries, and stamina. If you give any of them less than that they will never amount to much, and it'll take even longer now with the training changes. If you don't have any other trainees then you could possibly train two of those guys, but I think trying to train up two allrounders at the same time isn't a good idea.
 

GotSpin

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Finally some guys on the market to buy, gotta wait two days though but they are within my price range and have decent secondries
 

brenoevo

U19 12th Man
Won todays top of the table clash in V.167.
The Possums 3/252 50overs
Tiisetso 84 (115)
Pierce 58 (110)

College Dropouts 6/255 42.3overs
Kennedy 115 (111) not out MOTM, he also went past 1000 runs for the season 10 games
Vincent 78 (79)
Westrop 3/27

College Dropouts The Possums
Top Order: quality competent
Middle Order: mediocre competent
Lower Order: abysmal abysmal
Seam Bowling: respectable superb
Spin Bowling: useless mediocre
Fielding: mediocre mediocre
 
Last edited:

GotSpin

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Easy win today as expected but still low ratings due to morale. My team fitness is currently at invigorated
 

PY

International Coach
TIEd today and won far more comfortably than I thought I would. :)

Lancre Wowhawks 298/2 (50 overs)
Singh 1/51
Rampaul 1/55

Boggles 299/1 (41.5)
Chanderpaul 149* (131)
Abdul Kadir 120 (111)

Boggles
Top Order: proficient
Middle Order: mediocre
Lower Order: abysmal
Seam Bowling: respectable
Spin Bowling: respectable
Fielding: mediocre

Bring on Bobby-boy. :D
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top