Archived [18/10/06] : Battrick

[roseboy64]

I'm free for a friendly.

Ok challenged.

 

[Scaly piscine]

How far are these guys? Bent is on 1 bowling net. Stanton is on a bowling,fitness and batting net. Elsegood is on 1 each of batting,fielding and fitness. Wilmers is on a batting net and Chorley is on a keeping net. Weekes is on a bowling net.

[B]Ryan Bent[/B] (373799) 
RH Batsman, RM Bowler, superb batting form, mediocre bowling form, sublime 
A cautious player with competent leadership skills and worthless experience. 

Plays For: Boulevard Bombers 
Nationality: England 
Age: 19 Years Old 
Battrick Rating: 3,857 
Wages: £343 p/w 
 
Stamina: competent Wicket Keeping: woeful 
Batting: worthless Concentration: feeble 
Bowling: mediocre Consistency: feeble 
Fielding: woeful 

[B]Avery Elsegood[/B] (252711) 
LH Batsman, LF Bowler, superb batting form, superb bowling form, sublime 
A steady player with mediocre leadership skills and worthless experience. 

Plays For: Boulevard Bombers 
Nationality: West Indies 
Age: 19 Years Old 
Battrick Rating: 12,832 
Wages: £1,018 p/w 
 
Stamina: competent Wicket Keeping: worthless 
Batting: competent Concentration: competent 
Bowling: respectable Consistency: competent 
Fielding: feeble 

[B]Wolde Wilmers [/B](252714) 
LH Batsman, LF Bowler, superb batting form, proficient bowling form, sublime 
A defensive player with proficient leadership skills and abysmal experience. 

Plays For: Boulevard Bombers 
Nationality: West Indies 
Age: 19 Years Old 
Battrick Rating: 8,471 
Wages: £327 p/w 
 
Stamina: mediocre Wicket Keeping: woeful 
Batting: mediocre Concentration: respectable 
Bowling: abysmal Consistency: feeble 
Fielding: competent 

[B]Keith Stanton[/B] (453242) 
RH Batsman, RH Spin Bowler, competent batting form, proficient bowling form, fresh 
A destructive player with feeble leadership skills and worthless experience. 

Plays For: Boulevard Bombers 
Nationality: West Indies 
Age: 17 Years Old 
Battrick Rating: 2,467 
Wages: £477 p/w 
 
Stamina: abysmal Wicket Keeping: feeble 
Batting: mediocre Concentration: abysmal 
Bowling: mediocre Consistency: woeful 
Fielding: abysmal 

[B]Hendy Chorley [/B](396988) 
LH Batsman, LH Spin Bowler, superb batting form, superb bowling form, sublime 
An attacking player with strong leadership skills and abysmal experience. 

Plays For: Boulevard Bombers 
Nationality: West Indies 
Age: 18 Years Old 
Battrick Rating: 7,104 
Wages: £310 p/w 
 
Stamina: feeble Wicket Keeping: mediocre 
Batting: woeful Concentration: feeble 
Bowling: worthless Consistency: respectable 
Fielding: mediocre 

[B]Kenny Weekes[/B] (252706) 
RH Batsman, RH Spin Bowler, respectable batting form, superb bowling form, sublime 
A defensive player with strong leadership skills and abysmal experience. 

Plays For: Boulevard Bombers 
Nationality: West Indies 
Age: 22 Years Old 
Battrick Rating: 6,254 
Wages: £328 p/w 
 
Stamina: respectable Wicket Keeping: worthless 
Batting: abysmal Concentration: feeble 
Bowling: mediocre Consistency: feeble 
Fielding: competent

This is all at the point when their wages were calculated:

Bent is about 6 weeks through their 13-14 weeks.
Respectable/competent ranges from £800-£1350 - Elsegood is slightly on the low side of that. Impossible to say specifically how high either of the main primaries are.
Wilmers is nearly 4 weeks through their 13-14 weeks.
Mediocre/mediocre/feeble ranges from £350-£600 - Stanton is about a third of the way up that. Again, impossible to say how high each primary is specifically.
Chorley is at best 1 week through their ~8 weeks.
Weekes is about 4 weeks through their 16-17 weeks.

Obviously if they've been trained since the wage recalculations they'll be higher up their levels.

 

[roseboy64]

Ok thanks.

 

[ash chaulk]

i've challenged you

accepted

 

[cricketboy29]

Wages are recalculated at the end of every season right?

 

[nibbs]

yeh, buddy. they are indeed

 

[andyc]

With the new wages which are coming in to place, does anyone know if wages will be recalculated to include improvements from the start of the season?

 

[Adamc]

With the new wages which are coming in to place, does anyone know if wages will be recalculated to include improvements from the start of the season?

The new wage structure isn't being introduced until next season, so yes.

 

[andyc]

The new wage structure isn't being introduced until next season, so yes.

Ohhhh I was under the impression somehow it was coming in in a few weeks. Haha oops.

 

[andyc]

Very stupid batting here by my guys

End of Over 21: 100-2, runrate=4.76, reqrunrate=6.24 (280-4)
Gadsby 4-0-17-1
Drench* 9 (15 balls)
Griffin 42 (70 balls)

Am GFIing as I have a semi-decent chance of winning this. A bit disappointed that they got 280 after they were 2 for 19 off 6 or so. Hopefully Griffin will up the run rate a bit soon.

Edit: Oh crap. Drench gets out, then next over Griffin (strong) and Parr (my keeper) fall in consecutive balls. Only Nomvete and Canning left in now, am officially dead

End of Over 30: 146-5, runrate=4.87, reqrunrate=6.75 (280-4)
Mcandrew 5-0-13-2
Canning* 1 (2 balls)
Nomvete 6 (6 balls)

If we hadn't lost wickets we'd be set for a victory

 

[mikeW]

accidently set it to TIE so i lost

I'll GFI next week now.

 

[cameeel]

Kipper XI v Sydney CC @ Trentington

Sydney CC: 59 (22.3)

Swan 16
Vernon 5-9

Kipper XI: 0-60 (8.5) RR: 7.08

Waterhouse 33*
Brydon 22*

Result: Kipper XI win by 10 Wickets

MOTM: Dean Vernon (5-9)

Another easy bot win....

 

[andyc]

THCC 4/280
Paul 132* (158), Hammill 78 (98), Tierney 50 (28!)
Heard 2/72, Canning 1/49, Giles 1/55

Magical Ponies 183 (44)
Griffin 57 (92), Sutton 37 (41), Extras 30
McAndrew 5/25 (10), Grahames 2/38 (7), Gadsby 2/46 (10)

Think from now on I shouldn't set my bowlers so defensively, I really need to take more wickets.

THCC Magical Ponies
Top Order: proficient respectable
Middle Order: competent feeble
Lower Order: worthless abysmal
Seam Bowling: proficient mediocre
Spin Bowling: respectable mediocre
Fielding: feeble feeble

 

[ash chaulk]

Viveash 160a.o

Kenna 60 n.o

Mightykaro 5/161

Fleming 3/45

Viveash MightyKaro
Top Order: competent competent
Middle Order: competent mediocre
Lower Order: abysmal abysmal
Seam Bowling: competent competent
Spin Bowling: proficient competent
Fielding: mediocre feeble

my ratings are better but i lost hmmmm...

 

[PY]

I've noticed that been happening quite a bit recently actually, it's a little bizarre.

The team who knocked me out of the cup had wonderful rating for their seam bowling so not happened to me yet.

 

[Adamc]

Viveash 160a.o

Kenna 60 n.o

Mightykaro 5/161

Fleming 3/45

Viveash MightyKaro
Top Order: competent competent
Middle Order: competent mediocre
Lower Order: abysmal abysmal
Seam Bowling: competent competent
Spin Bowling: proficient competent
Fielding: mediocre feeble

my ratings are better but i lost hmmmm...

Your ratings weren't that much better. If you had say strong top order and seam bowling and still lost then you might feel unlucky, but there's not really much of a difference in ratings there.

 

[PY]

TIE'd today and managed an 8 wicket win (lost Chanderpaul with 4 required ).

Dare Devil CC 213/10 (48.3 overs)

Malik 3/46
Liyanage 2/26
Chanderpaul O 2/43

Boggles 219/2 (41.2 overs)

Chanderpaul S 106 (123)
Ahmed 74* (100)

MOTM Chanderpaul S

Dare Devils Boggles
Top Order: feeble respectable
Middle Order: feeble mediocre
Lower Order: abysmal abysmal
Seam Bowling: mediocre competent
Spin Bowling: feeble competent
Fielding: feeble feeble

Pretty happy with those ratings as I lost my last two games.

 

[Scaly piscine]

My team is 49-0 after 8 overs, have GFIed this game so will be a bit worrying if I don't win.

Is on a flat pitch, but partially cloudy and humid weather, so hard to gauge what sort of scores are good - flat pitches can be quite bowler friendly in Battrick.

 

[Scaly piscine]

118-1 after 18 overs, bit annoying to have lost Armstrong to a guy with these stats:

Bowling  O M    R  W   Ave     SR Econ Best 5wi 
Season  63 4  354  5 70.80  75.60 5.62  3-11 0 
Career 189 7 1034 11 94.00 103.09 5.47  3-11 0

 

[ash chaulk]

Your ratings weren't that much better. If you had say strong top order and seam bowling and still lost then you might feel unlucky, but there's not really much of a difference in ratings there.

yeh but i figured that having better ratings usually resulted in the win