• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Archived [10/08/07] Battrick

Status
Not open for further replies.

cricketboy29

International Regular
And that's the end of the match. Sad Decadent XI won by 8 wickets.
Kipper XI 256-10
Sad Decadent XI 257-2

Beat Kipper quite comfortably in the end, expected it to be much closer tbh.
 

chaminda_00

Hall of Fame Member
Well, Islam's an destructive spinner, and for me he rarely did the deed for me at 3. I moved him to 4, and hey presto, he started churning the wickets out. So i think position plays a huge role, and sometimes if your lucky, they take ickets becuase of the desturcitve temperament, but stay economical because of the fact that they're spinners. Amulya's best figures are indeed 6-17.
This might only because my destructive spinner is pretty average, but he only seems to keep it tight when bowling to worse batsmen. When bowling to better batsmen, he goes for quite a few runs, but has a habit of taking their wicket.
 

RoMojo

Cricket Spectator
Not that I'm complaining or anything, but has anyone else recorded some unusually high friendly attendances today?

http://www.battrick.org/nl/matchInfo.asp?matchID=1029858
Attendance: 14076
Standing: 5484
Uncovered Seats: 6408
Covered Seats: 1644
Members area: 540

EDIT: Ahhh, normal transmission has resumed:
Attendance: 1342
Standing: 601
Uncovered Seats: 567
Covered Seats: 132
Members area: 42
 
Last edited:

nibbs

International Captain
romojo, i think its best that the battrcik community stays quiet over this until the nz friendlies have been played. FFS
 

mikeW

International Vice-Captain
Won by 7 runs


Victoria Panthers

4/303

Bertos 154* off 134
Darryl 101 off 136

Roosters 4/296

Hook 0/33

Roosters Victoria Panthers
Top Order: proficient quality
Middle Order: mediocre feeble
Lower Order: worthless worthless
Seam Bowling: competent competent
Spin Bowling: respectable proficient
Fielding: feeble woeful


First ever Quality top order rating :cool:
 
Last edited:

RoMojo

Cricket Spectator
If only the battrick community would stay quiet.

Having had a look around the grounds today, it seems that the "problem" is an isolated one, and has been attributed to my superior stadium management/promotional team. Carry on.
 

Bobisback

International Regular
And what are peoples thoughts on Destructive Spinners are they ne good?
Code:
Bowling  	O  	M  	R  	W  	Ave  	SR  	Econ  	Best  	5wi
Season 		59 	6 	252 	27 	9.33 	13.11 	4.27 	7-13 	3
Career 		193 	20 	761 	62 	12.27 	18.68 	3.94 	7-13 	5
My destructive spinner is fair gun, but he doesnt bowl against many superb+ batters, not many strongs either.
 

PY

International Coach
I'm after that all-rounder too Brenevo. Fight, fight, fight....:cool:

Didn't get to set my orders against VCC, because he accepted after I'd switched my computer off. :dry:

Thus, I got bowled out for 143 on a hard & fast but have them 109/6. I have confidence he shall win because I didn't set my orders after selling my superb bowler so currently, I have a comp/feeb bowling and getting tonked. He's been hit for 49 off 8 overs and VCC are 111/7 so that's good isn't it? :(
 
Last edited:

PY

International Coach
Dunno, probably anywhere upto 3m. I might go more than that if someone bids on this guy of mine listed for 1.7m:

Philip Carey - 19 yo, BT Rating=11,414 [transfer listed]
RH Batsman, RM Bowler, superb batting form, superb bowling form, changeable
An attacking player with mediocre leadership skills and worthless experience.
Stamina: competent Wicket Keeping: worthless
Batting: superb Concentration: feeble
Bowling: worthless Consistency: worthless
Fielding: worthless

Bit annoyed he didn't sell for 2m to be honest, as a couple of guys who were similar but older went for 2m last week

I have 4.5m and need a batsmen and a bowler so the allrounder fits the bill well enough, I have two nets spare for him and he has a cool name. :p
 

Bobisback

International Regular
Won the toss and batted against Scaly. Took a whole 9 balls for a wicket, Hiller out in a stupid, stupid way.

1.3 W Summers to Hiller
Hiller just couldn't quite get his leg over. Out, hit wicket!

EDIT
3.6 4 Summers to Maughan
It's a quick outfield today. Even if Pace was on wheels he wouldn't catch that. Great timing from Maughan.
3.5 1 Summers to Hocking
Nicely flicked around to fine leg for the single.
3.4 4 Summers to Hocking
Hocking cuts at the ball, but it takes the top edge and sails over Armstrong for four, flukey runs.

Summers = overrated? :laugh:
 
Last edited:

Kweek

Cricketer Of The Year
ouch, sucks to be you PY
sorry I accepted! but I had to work till late, so came home and quickly accepted :happy:

still happy I won tbh

Boggles VCC
Top Order: strong proficient
Middle Order: competent mediocre
Lower Order: abysmal abysmal
Seam Bowling: respectable strong
Spin Bowling: proficient competent
Fielding: feeble feeble
 

The Baconator

International Vice-Captain
Gave Altoz a game today.

Alternative XI 208-10
Edgehill 53, Rhodes 4-30

Vindscreen VIpers 210-1
Shahid 98*, Rhodes 93*

Vindscreen VIpers Alternative XI
Top Order: competent mediocre
Middle Order: mediocre feeble
Lower Order: abysmal abysmal
Seam Bowling: competent competent
Spin Bowling: mediocre mediocre
Fielding: woeful woeful
 

Bobisback

International Regular
8.6 6 Pace to Hocking
Hocking with a great, huge shot. Out of the ground! Not four, but six runs.
8.5 4 Pace to Hocking
Lovely shot, Hocking's timing was like a Swiss watch.

Remarkable? Exquisite? What does Hocking care? Takes him to 30, which is what i expected to get team total wise.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top