Starfighter
Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
The clash of egos would be interesting, especially with Botham.
Nah, Barnes made it to the top 10 in the fast bowling ranking and lots of us had him in our top 8. Botham gets his fair share of respect. He has his critics but at point or another in these past couple of months someone has declared Gavaskar, Hayden, Lawry, Wasim, Weekes, Walcott, Greenidge and Lillee to be overrated. These are all off the top of my head and if you go further back in time you'll find people arguing against Headley, Pollock (all 3 of them), Imran and even Sobers. To counter this you have your nerds who have taken up the task of glorifying players whom they think underrated — like Goddard, Cowie, Ryan Harris etc.There seems to me that there is a concerted effort to diminish the performances of English cricketers. We've seen it with Botham, Stokes, Anderson and now Flintoff. That, plus the fact that there are those who are dismissive of early champions such as Barnes, suggests there is a certain bias among many CW members. Some would suggest it is based on an inferiority complex!
You mean Clouderson?Anderson
Trundler has pretty much said it already, but I don't think there's anything malicious behind what people have been posting about England players - Flem in particular is just screwing around atm. That said, I do actually feel that quite a few notable England players reputations do exceed their stats (for various reasons) so at lot ofthe discussion is fairly justifiable, even if the thread titles I believe you have in mind don't scream "balanced analysis"There seems to me that there is a concerted effort to diminish the performances of English cricketers. We've seen it with Botham, Stokes, Anderson and now Flintoff. That, plus the fact that there are those who are dismissive of early champions such as Barnes, suggests there is a certain bias among many CW members. Some would suggest it is based on an inferiority complex!
Sadly, during my brief time here, I've witnessed too much of the latterTrundler has pretty much said it already, but I don't think there's anything malicious behind what people have been posting about England players - Flem in particular is just screwing around atm. That said, I do actually feel that quite a few notable England players reputations do exceed their stats (for various reasons) so at lot ofthe discussion is fairly justifiable, even if the thread titles I believe you have in mind don't scream "balanced analysis"
On that last sentence, I do think it's a strength of CW that people can start pretty obivous troll/shitposting threads but we end up getting good debate and interesting discussion out of it anyway. On the other hand, lots of good threads descend into absolutely dire posting at some point too...
Reckon a big part of this is due to an outdated sarcasm/troll detector on your part tbhThere seems to me that there is a concerted effort to diminish the performances of English cricketers. We've seen it with Botham, Stokes, Anderson and now Flintoff. That, plus the fact that there are those who are dismissive of early champions such as Barnes, suggests there is a certain bias among many CW members. Some would suggest it is based on an inferiority complex!
Trolling is a recent (relatively speaking) occurrence that I'm not overly familiar with. As for sarcasm (defined as "the use of irony to mock or convey contempt") the intent is still to 'put-down' those targeted... an outdated sarcasm/troll detector on your part
as others have said you'll soon figure out which members are sincere in their outlandish beliefs and which are saying complete bullshit for a laughTrolling is a recent (relatively speaking) occurrence that I'm not overly familiar with. As for sarcasm (defined as "the use of irony to mock or convey contempt") the intent is still to 'put-down' those targeted.
I will continue to naively accept what is posted on its face value and if that makes me look 'outdated' so be it. At my age I've been called worse.
And this is objectively bollocks.Having said all that, it is objectively true that a lot of English players are greatly overrated, and that English members of the forum have a hard time accepting that. Even going so far as to put people who point out these uncomfortable truths in "lists" in an attempt to avoid reality.
nothing wrong with thatSo who draws the line between serious discussion on cricket and "joking", "stirring" and "having a laugh"?
I appreciate those who have offered me advice, but I enjoy rational discussion about one of my favourite topics and will continue to take things on face value. I can go elsewhere if I want to engage in the other nonsense.
With respect, you also need to appreciate you have joined here in unusual times. When there is cricket on we'll talk cricket, when there's not we talk ****. But there is (IMO anyway) a great sense of humour here.......and a bit of piss taking makes this an enjoyable place to visit. If your not into that then just interact with those that are here exclusively for cricket talk.........there's plenty of them.So who draws the line between serious discussion on cricket and "joking", "stirring" and "having a laugh"?
I appreciate those who have offered me advice, but I enjoy rational discussion about one of my favourite topics and will continue to take things on face value. I can go elsewhere if I want to engage in the other nonsense.