It looks like you didn't bother to check what caused Gurusinha's early current rating to spike. The most common criticism that I get for rating Test batting performances is that I give too much value to runs, so your comment makes me think I've adjusted well enough in that department.
OMG, so this is your website...and because someone scored 52 out of 82 he deserves to be rated above Bradman...you're delusional
Yeah, but that could also mean the rest of his team just batting like *** in that innings & that's hardly Bradman's fault is it.
We have asked him to only bring up the website in its own dedicated thread to it to stop this sort of thing. I thought the original post he made in here was an interesting enough exception to that rule but the subsequent discussion about the methodology has made me think I was wrong on that, so I might move the discussion into his thread if it goes much longer.
In order to keep the Voges vs Bradman vs Hussey thread realistic, I would hope that all the other website links are moved to their appropriate place...just my opinion, but happy with not commenting further on specific websites in this thread if not the case
Although even the 44 splits into 99 against New Zealand, 23 against everyone else.
He's only averaging 73; Gunaratne (the other not-out batsman) is averaging 83!
Nah, too small a sample size
(how on earth did I miss that?)
