Way too much icing. I feel like I'm in danger of becoming a diabetic just looking at their batting line-up.I think this is basically true, but Australia probably have too much icing in their lineup to really look at it like that.
Yeah at one point I think there were three Aussies in the box. It was stupid.Just read this thread. Some really bizarre posting from a small number of neutrals about expected scores and world class players, but interesting to read the emotional rollercoaster.
I would just like to point out how I find it disgraceful that there wasn't a better mix of commentators for this game. I think I counted 3 Kiwis (Smith, Doull, Richardson) and about 6 Australians (Waugh, Warne, Slater, Border, Julian, Lee). I didn't notice Healy or Nicholas, for which I am immensely relieved but FFS, can we not have a more balanced commentary team? If there's 3 Kiwis available, then 3 Aussies and 3 neutrals please.
So the fast bowler swung everywhere, baited Warner with a few boundaries and sixes, and then bowled one with no swing and tricked Finch. Is that what happened? Or is it random luck
I wonder if we actually have any spinners today ... or issit lots of fast bowlers vs Australia?
Could be wrong but I think boult southee and vittori are all spin bowlers. It looked pretty mild spin tho, about 300mm worth of lateral movement
Have checked out scores at Auckland since then, and while most games have tended towards lower scores, 350 around is very much gettable and chaseable if teams just last 50 overs, still feel, if not 400.Just read this thread. Some really bizarre posting from a small number of neutrals about expected scores and world class players, but interesting to read the emotional rollercoaster.
And how many since the introduction of two new balls?Have checked out scores at Auckland since then, and while most games have tended towards lower scores, 350 around is very much gettable and chaseable if teams just last 50 overs, still feel, if not 400.
Elliott's dismissal was terrible, granted... looked like he totally misjudged the line of the ball. But it's far too simplistic to form a whole bunch of fixed assumptions from one game.Well, we'll see how Southee bowls his first over when (and it is when) NZ play the WC final.
I don't care who is happier or not and all that rubbish. But people saying its just a random match which means nothing in terms of judging the players is oversimplying it. You know Starc is capable of delivering at the crunch now (I guess we already did but this is something else). You know Vettori still has it in him to dry up runs if the frontliners get caned. You know that Baz can beast it against the best, and not just minnows like England. You know Elliott is a piece of luggage. We know Southee gets nervous etc.
I actually think this will be good for Southee. He won't be all over the place bowling with nerves in his next big game, he'll be far more calmer. Zaheer needed something like that in 2003 when he bottled it.
look can you please just give up on this rubbishHave checked out scores at Auckland since then, and while most games have tended towards lower scores, 350 around is very much gettable and chaseable if teams just last 50 overs, still feel, if not 400.
I laughed until I cried. That's a perfect description of our innings.Pictured: New Zealand today
See I thought this would go undetected. Cummins zeroed in on McCullum's weak area, from ball one. He ain't comfortable against the short stuff. Whether it was a "good" delivery or not, it was right where you're likely to pick him up and it did the job. Pay all the others though.Nah holes in batting ability/shot selection exposed here.
Look both these teams have gun bowlers, but don't tell me that Twatto, Clarke and the two chop-ons were good bowling. Same with McCullum, Vettori and Anderson's dismissals. There was a **** load of thrown away or sloppy wickets. That's okay, that is ODI cricket. But there was some poor batting on display. It made for a ****ing awesome match to watch.
Yeah McCullum is weak to slow half trackers outside off, it was definitely a good plan by Cummins.See I thought this would go undetected. Cummins zeroed in on McCullum's weak area, from ball one. He ain't comfortable against the short stuff. Whether it was a "good" delivery or not, it was right where you're likely to pick him up and it did the job. Pay all the others though.