From an NZ perspective, wouldn't mind an SRL win as that would most likely set up an SA v AUS qf, eliminating one of the big threats at an early stage. Can't see it happening though.As Kiwi fans, how would we want the Sri Lanka/Australia match to go? If Sri Lanka beat Australia, it looks like it might be a re-run of this match in the Semi-Final providing Australia and New Zealand get through the Quarters that is.
you're nuts. if we want to hope for an easy road to the final we don't want to play the one team who have pushed us to the limit.SL are severely underrated. I'd rather face Aus.
yes but unless the bowlers bowl well, the batting team will score big which is back to my inital point that bpth teams bowled well..people who don't watch odis at eden park to stop commenting on it pls
300 is hard there unless you bat very well because of the pitch and the usual auckland conditions.
You clearly haven't watched much of Brendon McCullum then. He's hit countless 6s from thickish edges in that region & on much bigger grounds than this.This is not a shot at NZ!
BUT explain to me how a "fair" contest between bat and ball involves 45m boundaries, fielding restrictions and calling wides a millimetre outside the tram lines when the batsman has backed away 2 feet before the ball is delivered
I didn't watch much of the Oz innings (only saw the "highlights") but when McCullum can outside edge a cover drive for 6 over 3rd man, there is something very wrong with the balance of the game
Nah holes in batting ability/shot selection exposed here.Anyone saying this match is proof of anything other than these two sides can seriously bowl is coming to a very weird conclusion
Yes, but people who have evidently only just discovered the dimensions of the ground today coming in here saying 300 par and 400 likely are living in dream land because the cricket played here every summer has shown it's not true. the nature of the pitch, auckland atmosphere and the ground dimensions make for cricket matches which leap from extremely bowler friendly to extremely batsman friendly depending on the quality of the players involved.Look both these teams have gun bowlers, but don't tell me that Twatto, Clarke and the two chop-ons were good bowling. Same with McCullum, Vettori and Anderson's dismissals. There was a **** load of thrown away or sloppy wickets. That's okay, that is ODI cricket. But there was some poor batting on display. It made for a ****ing awesome match to watch.
Wasn't talking about ground size. Probably should quote the post I was replying to, was a post irrelevant to this weird ground size debate that is happening.Yes, but people who have evidently only just discovered the dimensions of the ground today coming in here saying 300 par and 400 likely are living in dream land because the cricket played here every summer has shown it's not true. the nature of the pitch, auckland atmosphere and the ground dimensions make for cricket matches which leap from extremely bowler friendly to extremely batsman friendly depending on the quality of the players involved.
bowlers have plenty to work with at eden park if they bowl well. teams get rolled here often. the windies rolled NZ here just last summer. some people refusing to get this point is what is annoying people.
Sure, but that's more evidence of potential mental frailty under big match and crunch situation pressure rather than anything that other teams can exploit cricketing wise.Nah holes in batting ability/shot selection exposed here.
Look both these teams have gun bowlers, but don't tell me that Twatto, Clarke and the two chop-ons were good bowling. Same with McCullum, Vettori and Anderson's dismissals. There was a **** load of thrown away or sloppy wickets. That's okay, that is ODI cricket. But there was some poor batting on display. It made for a ****ing awesome match to watch.