Top_Cat
Request Your Custom Title Now!
He's right up there with Imran's speed right now, though. That's about where the comparison ends.But the way he is hyped, you'd think he bowls like Imran and bats like Sobers......
He's right up there with Imran's speed right now, though. That's about where the comparison ends.But the way he is hyped, you'd think he bowls like Imran and bats like Sobers......
Not in ODI's he is not. Im more referring to FC cricket however, and the suggestion that he should be in the Test Match side. It's not on, and I will not rest until Hussey is exposed as the FC / Test Match fraud that he is!aussie said:i dont think its fair to say Hussey is over-rated......
yes...seriously considered including him....but then decided nobody really rated him too highly in the first place.howardj said:Oh, and the King of the over-rated is Stephen Fleming. Man, hasnt he dined out on that rain-marred, drawn series in Australia in 2001/02. Furthermore, as a batsman, he has a sub 40 average. Despite these things, people talk about him as though he is cricket royalty.
And none of them retired at the age of 27...C_C said:Flintoff is overrated.
He is a decent allrounder currently and i would put him in the same bracket as Chris Cairns, atleast as far as Tests go and a couple of notches below Botham/Hadlee/Kapil Dev/Vinoo Mankad/Tony Greig.
He has a long way to go to match some of the great allrounders in the game - Imran Khan, Sobers, Keith Miller, etc, let alone Sobers.
He had an ordinary ODI super series (with the ball anyway).....admittedly he was still p!ssed and was batting in hopeless situations due to the failings of his teammates.Mr Mxyzptlk said:And none of them retired at the age of 27...
I dont think Gillchrist is underrated but agree with most of yer picks. Tendulkar is underrated on this board if anything.Slats4ever said:Over-Rated
- Darren Lehmann
- Damien Martyn
- Sean Pollock
- Sachin Tendulkar
- Chaminda Vaas
- Inzimam Ul-Haq
Underrated
- Adam Gilchrist
- Michael Bevan
- Shoaib Akhtar (there's always been a big question mark over him being a world top 5 bowler when in my opinion he is)
- VVS Laxman
- Chanderpaul
- Vettori
Flintoff just came out of the most intense and exhausting series he may ever play. The last thing he wants to do right now is play an exhibition series. Consider that he heads to Pakistan immediately after too. Give the guy a break!sqwerty said:He had an ordinary ODI super series (with the ball anyway).....admittedly he was still p!ssed and was batting in hopeless situations due to the failings of his teammates.
I'll reserve judgement until after the test match and then next years ashes as to whether or not he can perform in Aus.
To be over-rated, you first must be ratedtooextracool said:James Anderson
Nathan Bracken
and those are just the first few that come to mind.....
Yeah I agree, Gilly ain't underrated in either form. Tendulkar is only underrated by a few members of the board, and its a case of the desire to go against the tide and popular view. The attention and praise he has received for the past decade+ results in this. That and the fact that his most difficult period of his career has come in the last two and a half years so his struggles are in people's most recent memory.C_C said:I dont think Gillchrist is underrated but agree with most of yer picks. Tendulkar is underrated on this board if anything.
However hard it was for Freddie......it was harder for the Aussies.Mr Mxyzptlk said:Flintoff just came out of the most intense and exhausting series he may ever play. The last thing he wants to do right now is play an exhibition series. Consider that he heads to Pakistan immediately after too. Give the guy a break!
Really? I wasn't aware it was harder for the Australians to lose the Ashes than for the English to win it. Also, I wasn't aware of any Australian who bowled as many overs as Flintoff did, then went in and scored as many runs.sqwerty said:However hard it was for Freddie......it was harder for the Aussies.
Freddie was at home thoughMr Mxyzptlk said:Really? I wasn't aware it was harder for the Australians to lose the Ashes than for the English to win it. Also, I wasn't aware of any Australian who bowled as many overs as Flintoff did, then went in and scored as many runs.
and people didnt think that anderson would be the next big thing after the 2003 world cup?howardj said:To be over-rated, you first must be rated
Well, maybe they had reasons for retaining Hayden. But why was Hayden given 15 tests to redeem himself and Martyn given only 3? That is my point. The selectors seem to think that Hayden is worth more than Martyn and I disagree with that big time.Top_Cat said:That's not fair on Kat, though is it? In the last year, he's batted every position in the order BAR opening and I honestly think it's part of why he's not really cemented his spot; being shuffled up and down the batting order does little to settle a player into a team.
Anyway, you only have to look at Kat's nervous prods outside off-stump to Flintoff and Harmison to see why he should never open the batting in Tests.
Australia has tried experimenting with make-shift openers in the past and it's risky. Rarely comes off in fact. Justin Langer is one very rare (and excellent, it has to be said) exception. But then he has that 'full face of the bat to the bowler' technique whereas I don't think Kat plays quite as well in the V, particularly early in his innings.
He is not Harmison. I don't think it makes too much difference to him whether he is at home or away as it seems to do to Harmison.sqwerty said:Freddie was at home though