• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Search results

  1. sunilz

    Cummins vs Bumrah

    Yet Bumrah has better 4th innings bowling average than Cummins. However you can carry on. Facts don't change your opinion.
  2. sunilz

    Battle of the Bashers: Sehwag vs Gilchrist

    And no peer rates Gilchrist over Sehwag as a Test bat. Gilchrist has less 3000 test runs than Sehwag. And you feel their batting output is same. But Laxman and Inzamam have same runs , but their batting output isn't same.
  3. sunilz

    Battle of the Bashers: Sehwag vs Gilchrist

    So you rate Laxman over Inzi because he wasn't a failure against 2 best bowling attacks of his time. Yes or No .
  4. sunilz

    Battle of the Bashers: Sehwag vs Gilchrist

    And what is this obsession with well rounded record ? Laxman probably has more well rounded record than Inzamam (Aus/Sa) . I doubt anyone would prefer Laxman over Inzamam.
  5. sunilz

    Battle of the Bashers: Sehwag vs Gilchrist

    Did you even read the point I was responding to ? He brought Murray mint . So Gilchrist failed in England against a very good attack. Same as Sehwag. Gilchrist also has a hole in record vs India. So his record is also not well rounded as you thought.
  6. sunilz

    Battle of the Bashers: Sehwag vs Gilchrist

    Gilchrist also never faced Anderson/Broad in their prime in England.
  7. sunilz

    Battle of the Bashers: Sehwag vs Gilchrist

    So Gilchrist did well against India by averaging 28 against them.
  8. sunilz

    Battle of the Bashers: Sehwag vs Gilchrist

    So when did Gilchrist open in those countries? Gilchrist was a complete shocker in 2005 Ashes iirc even when he didn't have to face new ball.
  9. sunilz

    Battle of the Bashers: Sehwag vs Gilchrist

    Cummins only became regular in Aus side from 2017 Ashes iirc. ? But unlike Bumrah he regularly plays nowadays. India don't play Bumrah at home , yet he misses most of the tournaments nowadays.
  10. sunilz

    Battle of the Bashers: Sehwag vs Gilchrist

    Like I wrote earlier it is like Cummins vs Bumrah. It is close but one is definitely better.
  11. sunilz

    Battle of the Bashers: Sehwag vs Gilchrist

    Gilchrist like Sehwag played many ATG knocks. I won't call him downhill skier. But I rate Sehwag marginally better.
  12. sunilz

    Battle of the Bashers: Sehwag vs Gilchrist

    This is similar to Cummins vs Bumrah. Where though both are excellent and highly entertaining , one is definitely better but by a small margin.
  13. sunilz

    Cummins vs Bumrah

    Cummins . Bumrah is mostly unfit. When both of them are fit there is nothing separating them. Bumrah is more comparable to Ryan Harris or Asif.
  14. sunilz

    Group 2 (Bangladesh, India, Pakistan, South Africa, Zimbabwe, Netherlands)

    Nice troll by Google CEO.?
  15. sunilz

    Group 2 (Bangladesh, India, Pakistan, South Africa, Zimbabwe, Netherlands)

    Hope it is not photoshopped. Both are contenders for greatest T20 knocks
  16. sunilz

    Better limited overs knock

    Difficult to compare 2 formats but still which is better ?
  17. sunilz

    Group 2 (Bangladesh, India, Pakistan, South Africa, Zimbabwe, Netherlands)

    Kohli 82 will be remembered at par with Tendulkar 98 in 2003 WC. God level knock.
  18. sunilz

    Group 2 (Bangladesh, India, Pakistan, South Africa, Zimbabwe, Netherlands)

    No difference between taking runs after getting bowled on free hit, taking runs after getting caught on boundary on free hit , taking runs after ball deflected on hitting stumps on a very good throw.
  19. sunilz

    Who is the worst player of all time that would be selected in every XI in history?

    I am not sure of this. Gambhir was in very good ODI form too. And Indian selectors have wrong habit of mixing formats. They really tried their best to fit Yuvraj Singh in India's test team . I think answer to your question is Damien Martyn or Kapil Dev (?)
  20. sunilz

    Who is the worst player of all time that would be selected in every XI in history?

    Langer wouldn't make India's playing 11 in 08-11 ( Till England tour ) . Gambhir was in immense form during those time and had habit of playing clutch knocks. I know Langer is better test opener than Gambhir but I am talking of these 3 years . And Gambhir was a better ODI batsman than...

Top