• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Search results

  1. M

    Better opener : Graeme Smith vs Sehwag

    that’s probably where I disagree. While I certainly value performances in more challenging conditions more than favourable conditions, I believe in certain rare cases it may be possible to be SO dominant in favourable conditions that it compensate for deficiencies outside of those conditions...
  2. M

    G Smith vs Kohli overseas

    Australia and South Africa are the only overseas locations that matter.
  3. M

    Better opener : Graeme Smith vs Sehwag

    I have no idea what you are talking about. the point is players should be rated on how they actually performed and their actual contributions to their teams success, not some theoretical assessment of how they would perform in some theoretical set of conditions where they don’t play or play...
  4. M

    Shane Warne vs Sachin Tendulkar

    Can someone explain what the case for Warne is?
  5. M

    Better opener : Graeme Smith vs Sehwag

    I think it’s pretty obvious to anyone that the highest quality player is the one who adds the most value to their team. Anything else is pointless abstraction.
  6. M

    Better opener : Graeme Smith vs Sehwag

    do you always use the “royal we” or do you have fleas?
  7. M

    Graham Gooch vs Vernon Philander

    Cook is about as good as Langer and may be worse than Khawaja ponting Over chappell but the point stands.
  8. M

    Better opener : Graeme Smith vs Sehwag

    what is the point of quality if not a utility for ateam? Surely that’s the only measure of quality
  9. M

    Wasim Akram vs Malcolm Marshall

    no basis for this other than personal preference
  10. M

    Wasim Akram vs Malcolm Marshall

    No you are just creating false precision to justify your personal preferences
  11. M

    Wasim Akram vs Malcolm Marshall

    There is no basis to distinguish this group from Steyn, Ambrose, Akram, Donald, Imran, Lillee etc
  12. M

    Wasim Akram vs Malcolm Marshall

    I would choose Akram and so would a decent majority of cricket fans, pundits and pkayers
  13. M

    Wasim Akram vs Malcolm Marshall

    There’s no bowling advantage. It’s all conjecture
  14. M

    Wasim Akram Vs Kallis

    wrong.
  15. M

    Wasim Akram Vs Kallis

    Anyone who actually saw Akram bowl would know he is amongst a handful of bowlers that qualify to be the GOAT. To definitely say any one bowler is better than him is pointless pedantry. The same could apply to Marshall, McGrath, Hadlee, Steyn, Ambrose etc
  16. M

    Graham Gooch vs Vernon Philander

    what is a man if not a hypocrite
  17. M

    Graham Gooch vs Vernon Philander

    none of these are unreasonable positions to take
  18. M

    Graham Gooch vs Vernon Philander

    for LO cricket he should be
  19. M

    Graham Gooch vs Vernon Philander

    well it is reflective of the broader tolerance for mediocrity in English sporting culture (and many other aspects of English culture)

Top