• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.
smash84

smash84

The Tiger King From IL
Joined
Last seen
Posts
33,292
Reaction score
3,337

Profile posts Latest activity Postings About

  • Ikki
    And as I replied to him, that is because there were two minnows in this decade - both which McGrath barely played. So again, the batsmen that both faced McGrath is better. More to the point; there were more "Great" batsmen during McGrath's time as opposed to many average ones.
    Ikki
    The difference between the 80s and 00s bowling is not much. One is 2.01 points cheaper on average, the other is 4.7 balls faster on SR. And as attacks go, I think we showed pages back that they actually improved. Either you put the difference in averages to the pitches only, the quality of the bowlers only or both. As I mentioned previously, the difference between batting averages in the 80s and 00s is 1.5 runs. That's it.
    Z-Man
    I wouldn't accept a pizza without your presence, no just no.
    we will wait :P
    Fusion
    We highly appreciate you reporting the post and not responding directly in the thread. Rest assured, action will be taken shortly.
    Cevno
    HahA!! My sleep patterns are ****ed at the moment tbh. Wake up at random times and go to sleep at random times:p

    What about you?
    GIMH
    If we give enough constructive feedback, things will get better I reckon. It's just quite hard to do without the thread getting closed down.
    GIMH
    Yeah I saw your message the other day. They have the right intentions but apply things badly, IMO
    Cevno
    Yeah, came as a big surprise to me too. Was a pretty good member,imo.

    Apparently the Moderators have really conclusive proof in terms of probably a IP match till the last digits that the was Avada Kedavra though(or atleast posting from the same computer), who has been banned in many avatars before including being the one who was abusing people on their walls a while back.
    GIMH
    Yeah mate the guy has more multis than I've had hot dinners. Used Blaze as his 'decent' persona
    Fusion
    VM's are public and are part of a forum. Anyone can read them. Leaving me a VM accusing someone of being a multi is not on. Surely you understand that the person you accuse of being a multi will (rightfully) take offense? If you are THAT concerned about it, then email us. If any action is warranted, we will take it. Once again, I must emphasize to you that you should not directly or indirectly accuse anyone of being a multi anywhere on the forum (VMs included).
    Fusion
    Actually catching a multi account is the mod's job, not yours. Let me be very clear: accusing another member of being a multi will lead to an infraction. While we appreciate your concern, this is not your responsibility. Like I said though, we will take action when we have proof of someone being a multi.
    Fusion
    Smali, please do not accuse someone of being a multi, even via VM. We have our own method of detecting multi accounts. We do not want members to engage into these type of allegations. Rest assured, if someone is a multi, we will take action against them.
    four_or_six
    I know it's always debatable exactly what is and isn't okay. Please do keep reporting posts to us if you have a concern over them, we do look at and discuss every one of them.
  • Loading…
  • Loading…
  • Loading…
Top