subshakerz
Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Bumrah loses because he was meant to take 25 in 5.What if Bumrah takes 25 wickets in 3 Tests and then does not play the next 2 test matches?
Bumrah loses because he was meant to take 25 in 5.What if Bumrah takes 25 wickets in 3 Tests and then does not play the next 2 test matches?
So Roberts is the greatest Windies pacer?Performance against NZ is inversely proportional to quality
Nope. No point in ratings. You change your pfp to a picture I select for the next year.How about If Bumrah takes more than 25, I concede that he's better than Warne.
I don't think rating ones are genuine. Like I can say Hill>Trumper or he can say Bumrah>Warne, but won't mean we believe that.For you hmmm…. Hill > Trumper or something to do with Ponting. For Johan, something to do with Compton. But I forget where exactly he rates him.
Maybe not inversely proportional... Let's say negative correlationSo Roberts is the greatest Windies pacer?
It's necessary, if we do not crush this disrespectful ass India then we might as well give up on Cricket, exile the national team barring Root in shame and go back to imperialism.Duckett like confidence
3 months, sure.Nope. No point in ratings. You change your pfp to a picture I select for the next year.
Yeah too soon.I do not know about Hill or Trumper
But if someone says that Bumrah > Warne, it is reasonable even if Warne had a better & longer career
On behalf of Johan, I agree he should do this.Nope. No point in ratings. You change your pfp to a picture I select for the next year.
6 months. Final offer.3 months, sure.
4.5 months, negotiate6 months. Final offer.
6 months4.5 months, negotiate
4.5 months, flip the coin.6 months
6 months, coin landed on tails. I always go with tails.4.5 months, flip the coin.
Okay, 6 months, and if you lose, I pick your pfp for 10 months.6 months, coin landed on tails. I always go with tails.
Another reason Ambrose is a tad overrated.Botham before his final rib injury has a higher WPI than Ambrose lmfao wtf
Botham a tad underrated I'd argue instead, some people don't get how excellent he was for the first 53% of his career, and overrated how bad he was for the next 35%Another reason Ambrose is a tad overrated.