• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Weekes vs Walcott

Better batsman


  • Total voters
    23

BazBall21

International Captain
Weekes definitely wins on peer rating and did moderately better in England. But Walcott had THAT series against Australia.
 

Slifer

International Captain
Yeah Weekes was still prolific in both series but Walcott was even better
You know what, you are 100% correct. And both had one good series in England and one awful. Then they both had one awful series in Australia, without any chance to redeem themselves. Still Walcott's performance was otherworldly which is why I give him the edge.
 

BazBall21

International Captain
You know what, you are 100% correct. And both had one good series in England and one awful. Then they both had one awful series in Australia, without any chance to redeem themselves. Still Walcott's performance was otherworldly which is why I give him the edge.
That's why I actually always went with Weekes. Because he had a dead-set good tour of England unlike Clyde, whereas both actually did well in the two Walcott magnum opus series'. But Walcott's barrage of hundreds came against much better attacks than the one Weekes beat up in England.
 

The Sean

Cricketer Of The Year
Walcott scored tons in each of the last two Tests against India in his series before that as well.

So over a period of 12 Tests, he hit 10 hundreds and totalled 1,773 runs at 88.65.

A decent run of form, really.
 

BazBall21

International Captain
11 hundreds and an average of 84 during his best 16-Test run; wish he was allowed to tour South Africa. The overseas opportunities were quite sparse.
 

Johan

Cricketer Of The Year
11 hundreds and an average of 84 during his best 16-Test run; wish he was allowed to tour South Africa. The overseas opportunities were quite sparse.
a large reason for why I think they're dealt a rough hand in comparison with modern day bats, like, one bad series and it's over for their away numbers, doesn't help that Weekes and Walcott had some bad luck with injuries too.
 

Johan

Cricketer Of The Year
Clyde and Everton played 41 tests together, that's a huge amount.


Everton Weekes: 3,877 @ 59.64, 55.3 runs per inning, 12 hundreds and 18 fifties.
Clyde Walcott: 3,477 @ 55.19, 50.3 runs per inning, 14 hundreds and 13 fifties.

funnily, Worrell has the highest average in the games where all three Ws aligned, but eh that also includes the injury ridden 1951 Australia and 1957 England.
 

The Sean

Cricketer Of The Year
While Tom Graveney says, diplomatically, in his interview with CMJ there that he can't split the three Ws, he did in fact do so on at least one occasion.

In Tom Graveney's Top Ten Cricket Book (one of my all time favourite and most referenced cricket books), published in 1982, his list of the Top Ten Greatest Post-War Batsmen had Walcott at number 6 and Weekes and number 9, while also noting that he agonised over Worrell just missing out.
 

Top