• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Cricket stuff that doesn't deserve its own thread

SteveNZ

International Coach
I didn't know where to put this, but the Howie Games (Mark Howard) podcast episode end of last month with Ricky Ponting is about the best use of an hour and half I've come across in a long time.

Best thinker and ability to articulate it in the game, daylight being second. Incredible listen, I thought
 

SeamUp

International Coach


Very interesting view from one of the new gen players. I feel sometimes we underrate the difficulties of the shorter formats.
Travis Head was saying the same.

There is no doubt scoring quickly with time constraints isn't easy, especially with the ceiling being lifted on possibilities/capabilities.

But I just think of you faced high quality attacks and challenged almost every time (game & opponent) with seam/spin in test cricket they wouldn't be saying it so easily.
 

wellAlbidarned

International Coach
Travis Head was saying the same.

There is no doubt scoring quickly with time constraints isn't easy, especially with the ceiling being lifted on possibilities/capabilities.

But I just think of you faced high quality attacks and challenged almost every time (game & opponent) with seam/spin in test cricket they wouldn't be saying it so easily.
we're currently in one of the toughest ever batting eras for test cricket
 

Shady Slim

International Coach
Travis Head was saying the same.

There is no doubt scoring quickly with time constraints isn't easy, especially with the ceiling being lifted on possibilities/capabilities.

But I just think of you faced high quality attacks and challenged almost every time (game & opponent) with seam/spin in test cricket they wouldn't be saying it so easily.
i think it’s a weird take in that the stakes are also much lower for t20 than they are for a test match which i don’t think they’re factoring in
 

Burgey

Request Your Custom Title Now!
You’re going to get a wider range of shots making their way into test cricket from LO formats as the game evolves. ODIs had a similar impact once they proliferated.

Why is the current era is tough for test batting? There’s decent bowlers atm and there are more result oriented pitches than 10-15 years ago.

There have been similar eras in the past, but what may have changed is the approach of batsmen to that challenge. Previously the common approach would be to back your defensive technique and patiently accumulate until the deck flattened and conditions eased.

These days more players are proactive and play to their attacking strengths, leading to more of a “get them before they get you” approach to batting on decks doing a lot.

It’s also worth noting there have always been attacking players who take the game on, but there are more of them these days. Going a fair way back, you would have a bloke like Doug Walters in your side and he would be a lock at six, never higher, because the orthodox approach was to see off the new ball. Different approach these days, largely born of LO cricket imo
 

thierry henry

International Coach
I've never thought that T20 batting wasn't hard, in fact I'm predisposed to think it's incredibly hard because of my own limitations as a player. The hitting ability of the modern player blows my mind.

I just don't think T20 is interesting because "aggressive fielding side trying to work out a way to get rid of stubborn batter" is cricket to me. I just don't give a **** about "fearful bowler trying to keep the ball out of the hitting zone of batter with no fear of getting out". That's simply not an engaging sport to me. Neither batter or bowler is genuinely engaged in the fundamental contest of get him out/don't get out.
 

honestbharani

Whatever it takes!!!
It’s also worth noting there have always been attacking players who take the game on, but there are more of them these days. Going a fair way back, you would have a bloke like Doug Walters in your side and he would be a lock at six, never higher, because the orthodox approach was to see off the new ball. Different approach these days, largely born of LO cricket imo

Yeah, it has gone from a choice to a default today IMO.
 

andruid

Cricketer Of The Year
I was marginally better than the actual umpire decision. (29-26 points)

 

Starfighter

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
35-25 from 29.

I noticed it gives you two points if you go not out for umpire's call but only one if you go out, which is wrong because it has to be projected to hit the stumps to get it (this seems to be an ideological point from the creator, 'benefit of the doubt' has never been a law); and that the high angle of the television broadcast makes judging height hard, most of my misses were for height.
 

StephenZA

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
45-25 off 30.

Definitely feels biased against the umpires call. Can understand the high number the umpires get wrong in the video because the use of drs will be biased that way.
 

Top