Which for many years, has been selection criteria on the West Tasman. What was his downfall?Siddons is a **** though
Which for many years, has been selection criteria on the West Tasman. What was his downfall?Siddons is a **** though
Brad Hodge agrees with you.I just can't get my head around how he's even on the tour, let alone picked. OK, Murphy bowled dross in the 1st Test, but you're going to play a batting 'all-rounder' at 8, then hardly bowl him when he's a part, part-timer at best? Are selectors trying to make heroes of themselves by flinging in Hail Mary young guys in the hope they might average 45 at a S/R of over 100 and take wickets at 28s? I truly don't get it. Steve Smith says 'he bowls good balls in the nets' which is a high bar to have to leap over to get a baggy green.
Jamie Siddons must sit in a dark room and wonder whether he should end it all some days. 160 quality FC games and can't crack it once, yet these young guys can extravagantly nick three through the cordon and all of a sudden they blow up on X and they're wearing an Australian crest soon after.
It's a hell of a time to be alive for a young cricketer. You're right, they looked for any excuse to play Connelly...for reasons only they'd know. It's an 'old team' given after McSweeney was dropped in the BGT they didn't have a single 20-something year old, so maybe they are looking to promote youth at any given opportunity.with that logic they should have picked McSweeney as the extra bat instead though
Let's just tell it how it is, they were looking for any excuse to get Connolly a game. "Oh he bowls some left arm spin" was a cop out
Jamie Siddons is one of quite a few players to play little to no Test cricket for Australia despite having good records in domestic competitions. It just shows how strong an era Australian cricket was - the 1990s through to the mid 2000s, compared to now and the past ten to fifteen years, it hasn't been strong depthwise.
Yeah, there's a few without even thinking - Siddons, Law, Elliott, di Venuto, Hodge, Bichel, even MacGill and I'm sure there's more who suffered from the era they played in being incredibly strong.Brad Hodge agrees with you.
He wasn’t good enough to make that sideWhich for many years, has been selection criteria on the West Tasman. What was his downfall?
Fair enough. Wasn't much chop as a coach in Wellington, either.He wasn’t good enough to make that side
God help me for replying seriously to this but he averages over 60 for WA in a side that is currently 7/50. He's an automatic selection for them.Kusal needs to farm the strike and get the lead to 100+. if its under 100, its australias game.
Re Connolly i dont see a future for him at this level. Even the state side will be lucky to pick him consistently, he hasnt been tested enough at State level.
Most of our upcoming stars are T20 material type of cricketers, that includes Konstas.
thats a very tough wicket though. Both teams havent crossed 120 ish. difficult pitch, which can happen at WACAGod help me for replying seriously to this but he averages over 60 for WA in a side that is currently 7/50. He's an automatic selection for them.
This T20 flat wicket Konstas you talk about, is that the same Konstas that played his first ever T20 game only a week before his Test debut?Most of our upcoming stars are pro T20 flat wickets type of cricketers, that includes Konstas. No fault on the youngsters, thats how its going globally, thats where the money is if you want to be a cricketer. T20 cricketers get paid millions of dollars. Test cricketers? Not that much unless you are in one of the top teams.
Lol who was Fraser-McGurk in this analogy (please say Doncic)?I almost puked the other day, Matt Short was asked to provide a cricketing comparison to the Doncic/AD mega trade and he used Fraser-McGurk's name.
Yep... 200 catches and counting...Wasn't that Smiths 200th catch. He should have thrown in a dive to make it look more difficult