• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

**Official** Australia in Sri Lanka Jan - Feb 2025

Gob

International Coach
Well, Sri Lanka at least fought. Mendis still out there gives them a glimmer, but he'd need to go hard to get them to something defendable.

Connolly's selection remains pointless but thankfully Kuhnemann and Lyon have bowled well enough for it to not matter too much.
Mumbai 2004
 

Spikey

Request Your Custom Title Now!
seems silly that catch is allowed when stuff like the starc catch in the ashes wasn't
more I think about it, the more I think matthews should have stayed on the field and got the 3rd umpire to look at it. seems absurd to me that webster could be deemed to have completed that catch. if he had held onto it, gone through his roll and fumbled it during the roll, it would not have been given, so why would throwing it away before finishing the roll complete the catch

now, matthews shouldn't have to stick around so that the umpires actually look at it, but that's a different matter
 

Gob

International Coach
more I think about it, the more I think matthews should have stayed on the field and got the 3rd umpire to look at it. seems absurd to me that webster could be deemed to have completed that catch. if he had held onto it, gone through his roll and fumbled it during the roll, it would not have been given.

now, matthews shouldn't have to stick around so that the umpires actually look at it, but that's a different matter
Well Starc catch was not given for completely different reasons. He jammed the ball in to the turf

Similar instance to this one would be cummins's caught and bowl of Azar Ali was it when they were in Pakistan
 

Spikey

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Well Starc catch was not given for completely different reasons. He jammed the ball in to the turf

Similar instance to this one would be cummins's caught and bowl of Azar Ali was it when they were in Pakistan
starc's catch was a catch that for the previous 20 years they've rubber stamped, and one day they decided not to. likewise, they've rubber stamped quick throwaways of catches like webster's. you'd think one crackdown would apply to the other. matthews should have put it to the test.
 

Spikey

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Also this is the starc catch im referring to. If starc had just thrown it away as soon as he got the hands on it like Webster did today, that's a catch?


 

Gob

International Coach
Also this is the starc catch im referring to. If starc had just thrown it away as soon as he got the hands on it like Webster did today, that's a catch?


If he did that though, we wouldn't have witnessed the greatest collective hissy fit of all time
 

Shady Slim

International Coach
totally agree with the above posts. don't know if they need an nfl style "survive to the ground" rule but i hate the midair throwaway and to me it's not consummated
 

halba

International Debutant
the Webster one looked dubious to me, why didnt Mathews stay? Your body has to complete the entire motion/ rotation with the ball in hand. ITs like herschelle gibbs one, dropping the world cup.
 
Last edited:

SteveNZ

International Coach
Connolly's selection remains pointless
I just can't get my head around how he's even on the tour, let alone picked. OK, Murphy bowled dross in the 1st Test, but you're going to play a batting 'all-rounder' at 8, then hardly bowl him when he's a part, part-timer at best? Are selectors trying to make heroes of themselves by flinging in Hail Mary young guys in the hope they might average 45 at a S/R of over 100 and take wickets at 28s? I truly don't get it. Steve Smith says 'he bowls good balls in the nets' which is a high bar to have to leap over to get a baggy green.

Jamie Siddons must sit in a dark room and wonder whether he should end it all some days. 160 quality FC games and can't crack it once, yet these young guys can extravagantly nick three through the cordon and all of a sudden they blow up on X and they're wearing an Australian crest soon after.
 

social

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
I just can't get my head around how he's even on the tour, let alone picked. OK, Murphy bowled dross in the 1st Test, but you're going to play a batting 'all-rounder' at 8, then hardly bowl him when he's a part, part-timer at best? Are selectors trying to make heroes of themselves by flinging in Hail Mary young guys in the hope they might average 45 at a S/R of over 100 and take wickets at 28s? I truly don't get it. Steve Smith says 'he bowls good balls in the nets' which is a high bar to have to leap over to get a baggy green.

Jamie Siddons must sit in a dark room and wonder whether he should end it all some days. 160 quality FC games and can't crack it once, yet these young guys can extravagantly nick three through the cordon and all of a sudden they blow up on X and they're wearing an Australian crest soon after.
I don’t think that anyone will be surprised if Connolly isn’t picked for another test squad for 3 years or so which is probably the appropriate timeline for his career

Picking him here was rubbish but the selectors will simply point to the scoreboard and a series victory
 

Gob

International Coach
Well he is averaging over 60 in the SS which includes runs in a shield final so it's not like they picked jake fraser mcgurk

A lottery pitch was expected here hence they wanted to lengthen the batting as games don't last very long on such wickets and more often than not, 3 front line bowlers are enough to get the job done

Obviously they read the pitch wrong and CC batted like a muppet but I get the thinking. It's not that difficult to see
 

The_CricketUmpire

First Class Debutant
I just can't get my head around how he's even on the tour, let alone picked. OK, Murphy bowled dross in the 1st Test, but you're going to play a batting 'all-rounder' at 8, then hardly bowl him when he's a part, part-timer at best? Are selectors trying to make heroes of themselves by flinging in Hail Mary young guys in the hope they might average 45 at a S/R of over 100 and take wickets at 28s? I truly don't get it. Steve Smith says 'he bowls good balls in the nets' which is a high bar to have to leap over to get a baggy green.

Jamie Siddons must sit in a dark room and wonder whether he should end it all some days. 160 quality FC games and can't crack it once, yet these young guys can extravagantly nick three through the cordon and all of a sudden they blow up on X and they're wearing an Australian crest soon after.
Jamie Siddons is one of quite a few players to play little to no Test cricket for Australia despite having good records in domestic competitions. It just shows how strong an era Australian cricket was - the 1990s through to the mid 2000s, compared to now and the past ten to fifteen years, it hasn't been strong depthwise.
 

TheJediBrah

Request Your Custom Title Now!
A lottery pitch was expected here hence they wanted to lengthen the batting as games don't last very long on such wickets and more often than not, 3 front line bowlers are enough to get the job done
with that logic they should have picked McSweeney as the extra bat instead though

Let's just tell it how it is, they were looking for any excuse to get Connolly a game. "Oh he bowls some left arm spin" was a cop out
 

Burgey

Request Your Custom Title Now!
I just can't get my head around how he's even on the tour, let alone picked. OK, Murphy bowled dross in the 1st Test, but you're going to play a batting 'all-rounder' at 8, then hardly bowl him when he's a part, part-timer at best? Are selectors trying to make heroes of themselves by flinging in Hail Mary young guys in the hope they might average 45 at a S/R of over 100 and take wickets at 28s? I truly don't get it. Steve Smith says 'he bowls good balls in the nets' which is a high bar to have to leap over to get a baggy green.

Jamie Siddons must sit in a dark room and wonder whether he should end it all some days. 160 quality FC games and can't crack it once, yet these young guys can extravagantly nick three through the cordon and all of a sudden they blow up on X and they're wearing an Australian crest soon after.
Siddons is a **** though
 

the big bambino

Cricketer Of The Year
Kuhnemann has outbowled lyon here slightly again...Lyon perhaps losing his edge slightly , which is due to age.
Yeah but if Lyon takes a wicket in his next over it'd be "Lyon is the number one spinner. He is on track to break Murali's record but who will replace him when he retires as we don't have any young spinners coming through."
 

social

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
with that logic they should have picked McSweeney as the extra bat instead though

Let's just tell it how it is, they were looking for any excuse to get Connolly a game. "Oh he bowls some left arm spin" was a cop out
Especially as McSweeney is a better bowler
 

Qlder

International Regular
Cooper Connolly is now an 'all-format" player for Australia. Combined stats in 5 games:

11 runs @ 11.00, HS 7*, SR 50.0
14 overs, 0 wkts for 97 runs, econ 6.93

So it must be his once in a generation FC record that got him a test at only 21....oh wait
 

halba

International Debutant
Cooper Connolly is now an 'all-format" player for Australia. Combined stats in 5 games:

11 runs @ 11.00, HS 7*, SR 50.0
14 overs, 0 wkts for 97 runs, econ 6.93

So it must be his once in a generation FC record that got him a test at only 21....oh wait
He just played a few FC games on one deck. Looks like he will struggle to get games for his state side consistently. He was talked up a lot before the game.
 

Top