• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Viv Richards vs steve smith

Who had better peak

  • Viv

    Votes: 12 40.0%
  • Smith

    Votes: 18 60.0%

  • Total voters
    30

govinda indian fan

International 12th Man
Viv Richards - averaged only 52 in wins - only 12 tons - all whilst having the best bowling attack ever. Pretty impressive matchwinner.

Wasn’t even the most matchwinning batsman on his own team.

In wins with both batsmen

Viv 3750 @ 50.67 11 tons vs Greenidge 4631 @ 55.79 14 tons
Viv 2627 @ 54.72 7 tons vs Lloyd 2792 @ 60.69 8 tons
Viv 1902 @ 48.76 6 tons vs Richardson 2453 @ 54.51 9 tons
Boy😲 i was so wrong
 

Johan

International Captain
Like..... Who in their right mind ever denied that!!??? That wasn't the question here. Subz said Konstas' that innings changed the course of the series (or some ****), to which I objected. It was a good innings, but neither series changing nor it broke down Bumrah.
Yeah, Crawley will break down Bumrah up top
 

Kirkut

International Regular
Yeah I don't went to get bogged down by the debate on the innings impact. The point is Konstas approach did affected the innings momentum and messed with the main bowlers approach. Viv was like that X 100.

You won't get that with an accumulator.
Again no. Dear god, the myth of Viv Richards has certainly been blown out of proportion. This is now bordering Mohammed Zahid bowling at 170 kph theory.
 

subshakerz

Hall of Fame Member
Like..... Who in their right mind ever denied that!!??? That wasn't the question here. Subz said Konstas' that innings changed the course of the series (or some ****), to which I objected. It was a good innings, but neither series changing nor it broke down Bumrah.
I said it was a seminal moment in the series which it felt like at the time as it allowed Australia to gain what seemed a distinct advantage.
 

Top