• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Viv Richards vs steve smith

Who had better peak

  • Viv

    Votes: 15 38.5%
  • Smith

    Votes: 24 61.5%

  • Total voters
    39

sayon basak

Cricketer Of The Year
Sure but not with the frequency to have a label of a matchwinner. Even Lara probably played 2-3 pure undisputed matchwinning knocks in his career.
Why is it a stretch to call a batter "match winner"? Being an inferior match winner to some specific bowlers shouldn't disqualify the batter from the title as a whole.
 

subshakerz

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Why is it a stretch to call a batter "match winner"? Being an inferior match winner to some specific bowlers shouldn't disqualify the batter from the title as a whole.
What qualifies a batter to become a matchwinner and who do you consider fitting the criteria?
 

Coronis

Hall of Fame Member
Sure but not with the frequency to have a label of a matchwinner. Even Lara probably played 2-3 pure undisputed matchwinning knocks in his career.
If you want to use this same logic for bowlers…

Also fun fact: nobody actually wins matches by themselves.
 

subshakerz

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Isn't that contradicting Konstas' role in Melbourne win?
Konstas didn't win the match though. He just set the momentum for the others to win the game. Isn't that obvious?

But for your sake I will say he deserved the MOS based on that opening knock.
 

Top