subshakerz
Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Batsmen generally don't have the same decisive match impact as bowlers.Not really
Batsmen generally don't have the same decisive match impact as bowlers.Not really
Doesn't mean they can't win matches.Batsmen generally don't have the same decisive match impact as bowlers.
Sure but not with the frequency to have a label of a matchwinner. Even Lara probably played 2-3 pure undisputed matchwinning knocks in his career.Doesn't mean they can't win matches.
Why is it a stretch to call a batter "match winner"? Being an inferior match winner to some specific bowlers shouldn't disqualify the batter from the title as a whole.Sure but not with the frequency to have a label of a matchwinner. Even Lara probably played 2-3 pure undisputed matchwinning knocks in his career.
What qualifies a batter to become a matchwinner and who do you consider fitting the criteria?Why is it a stretch to call a batter "match winner"? Being an inferior match winner to some specific bowlers shouldn't disqualify the batter from the title as a whole.
If a batter wins matches, he's a match winner imo.What qualifies a batter to become a matchwinner and who do you consider fitting the criteria?
If you want to use this same logic for bowlers…Sure but not with the frequency to have a label of a matchwinner. Even Lara probably played 2-3 pure undisputed matchwinning knocks in his career.
Isn't that contradicting Konstas' role in Melbourne win?The idea of a matchwinning batsman is itself a stretch, Bradman aside.
Isn't that contradicting Konstas' role in Melbourne win?
Konstas didn't win the match though. He just set the momentum for the others to win the game. Isn't that obvious?Isn't that contradicting Konstas' role in Melbourne win?
Top bowlers have way more matchwinning spells on average.If you want to use this same logic for bowlers…
Also fun fact: nobody actually wins matches by themselves.
How often does that happen in a typical greats career?If a batter wins matches, he's a match winner imo.
You might claim them as matchwinning but are they matchwinning without whatever knock either set them up or finished the job?Top bowlers have way more matchwinning spells on average.
Hopefully we'll see Smith and Root at the top of the chart very soon.This is shocking.
View attachment 45184
Why?This is shocking.
View attachment 45184
Why?
Root...The guy who debuted as a leg spinner will most likely end up with most catches and arguably as the best batsman since Don
Smith could catch up tho.Root...
Smith is older, less in form and plays less test. Unlikely.Smith could catch up tho.