• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Steve Smith vs Sachin Tendulkar (after 205 innings)

Who is more impressive?

  • Steve Smith

    Votes: 17 45.9%
  • Sachin Tendulkar

    Votes: 20 54.1%

  • Total voters
    37

akilana

International 12th Man
Good to know then Lara has no Great away Series as well; since then surely 688 in a whitewash holds no weight.
SA scored 600+ and india were trailing by 500 runs, there was no way they were winning. The intensity from SA bowlers won't be the same as say when the match is in balance. If he had scored that hundred in the first innings, ya then it's fair. But if you think sachin's hundred in that second innings hold the same weight as Lara's any of the hundreds in sri lanka.. congratulations.
 

Coronis

International Coach
SA scored 600+ and india were trailing by 500 runs, there was no way they were winning. The intensity from SA bowlers won't be the same as say when the match is in balance. If he had scored that hundred in the first innings, ya then it's fair. But if you think sachin's hundred in that second innings hold the same weight as Lara's any of the hundreds in sri lanka.. congratulations.
I would think one would try and be intense to push for the win
 

somuyal

Cricket Spectator
What are Sachin's best touring performances, in 24 year career probably Aus in 99/00 and SA in 10/11. Neither series he really dominated.

Rest of his away tours I don't think he distinguished himself as the best touring batter, I'd say Dravid & sometimes even Sehwag did better.

Still I'd pick him ahead of Smith though, could change by end of Smith's career who knows.
Wow, good to know about this informative stats.
Dravid has 3 mots in sena , which is the highest by an Indian, bumrah can break that record.
 
Last edited:

L Trumper

State Regular
Aus 07/08- 4 matches, 493 runs @70
SA 2010/11- 3 matches, 326 runs @81

Surely count as dominant tours. The one in SA had Steyn bowling as well as a fast bowler ever has too.
Yeah probably 07/08 Aus tour I agree.

SA tour I wouldn't say great tour. He had a great final test, but Laxman played even brilliant knock in Durban test on a much tougher deck.
 

L Trumper

State Regular
17 hundreds in SENA.
Multiple good tours in each nation.

6 tons in Aus
5 tons in SA
4 tons in Eng (plus 3 90s)

Yes, he is incredible at hitting a century in a series so if he tours 4 or 5 times he'd get that many hundreds. But not a batter who dominates series away from home. Dravid did it at a better rate despite being not as good a batsman and playing in the same lineup and in fewer series.

Funnily Tendulkar didn't have this problem in ODIs, but definitely a weak point in tests.
 

centurymaker

Cricketer Of The Year
Yes, he is incredible at hitting a century in a series so if he tours 4 or 5 times he'd get that many hundreds. But not a batter who dominates series away from home. Dravid did it at a better rate despite being not as good a batsman and playing in the same lineup and in fewer series.

Funnily Tendulkar didn't have this problem in ODIs, but definitely a weak point in tests.
Dravid also toured those nations almost as much as Tendulkar. Dravid struggled in both Australia and South Africa almost throughout his career.

Basing it all on the stats doesn't tell you everything. Tendulkar when he batted made fewer errors, looked more assured and in his prime looked to get on top. Dravid was the grinder. He may have numbers in certain places but Tendulkar was the better overseas batter. (Anyone who watched knows). The main reason Tendulkar doesn't have a very dominant series away from home is because India would only play 2 match or 3 match series in his prime. Add a test to each of the series from his 'prime', and you'd get a whole bunch of series with high runs tally. (Longer series are better as you get used to opposition bowlers and conditions).
 
Last edited:

centurymaker

Cricketer Of The Year
Yes, he is incredible at hitting a century in a series so if he tours 4 or 5 times he'd get that many hundreds. But not a batter who dominates series away from home. Dravid did it at a better rate despite being not as good a batsman and playing in the same lineup and in fewer series.

Funnily Tendulkar didn't have this problem in ODIs, but definitely a weak point in tests.
In Aus, Eng and SA (top sides)

Dravid 77 inns, 8 tons, avg 45.88
Sachin 96 inns, 15 tons, avg 51.64
 

L Trumper

State Regular
In Aus, Eng and SA (top sides)

Dravid 77 inns, 8 tons, avg 45.88
Sachin 96 inns, 15 tons, avg 51.64

Tendulkar is a better batter than Dravid so I'd expect his stats to be better.

But as you said in your other post stats don't tell everything. When it comes to individual series away from home, when Dravid clicked he performed better across the series and that is something Tendulkar lacked comparing against most of the other great batters.
 

subshakerz

Hall of Fame Member
SA scored 600+ and india were trailing by 500 runs, there was no way they were winning. The intensity from SA bowlers won't be the same as say when the match is in balance.
Just a spell sample from that century in that test. Certainly no walk in the park though I can understand why you would rate other tons higher.

 

centurymaker

Cricketer Of The Year
Getting wise in his old age tbh.

Seriously, 39 players have taken 300 wickets. 15 have scored 10000 runs.

To be part of both of those clubs is insane to think about.
Actually Kallis has 292 Test wickets. But yeah it's astonishing.
 

Top