• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Cricket stuff that doesn't deserve its own thread

Spikey

Request Your Custom Title Now!

Immenso

International Vice-Captain
this is so mega out, and i am half convinced banton called him back because he's afraid of validating the bairstow dismissal (even though this was so much more out than bairstow, which was also out tbf)
Reminds me much more of McCullum dismissing Muralitharan back in the late 00s. Than the Bairstow incident
 
Last edited:

AndrewB

International Vice-Captain
But the Bairstow one is definitely out too because the keeper threw the ball immediately he received it. In both cases the batsman isn’t looking to run, rather they’re both just entitled Pommy idiots who typically think the laws don’t apply to them.
Of course, there have been "entitled Aussie idiots" as well (see also the original Ashes Test in 1882 - harder to find on YouTube), and at least one "entitled West Indian" for which the decision was actually overturned.
 

Top