Certainty not. Smith's avg against deliveries faster than 90 mph is mid 30s iirc. This stat was revealed in the Ashes 2023. Plus Smith never faced bowlers bowling at 155+, while Tendulkar faced Lee & Akhtar. So express pace is certainly Tendulkar. Medium pace may be different.Smith almost certainly against express pace
this was posted in 2020, Smith at peak averaging Bradman esque numbers against express pace, Kohli fell off after this and Smith too to an extent but I think this shows how good Smith was against express pace at peak.Certainty not. Smith's avg against deliveries faster than 90 mph is mid 30s iirc. This stat was revealed in the Ashes 2023. Plus Smith never faced bowlers bowling at 155+, while Tendulkar faced Lee & Akhtar. So express pace is certainly Tendulkar. Medium pace may be different.
No way this is correct.this was posted in 2020, Smith at peak averaging Bradman esque numbers against express pace, Kohli fell off after this and Smith too to an extent but I think this shows how good Smith was against express pace at peak.
View attachment 44787
Nortje, wood are 155+ blowers.Certainty not. Smith's avg against deliveries faster than 90 mph is mid 30s iirc. This stat was revealed in the Ashes 2023. Plus Smith never faced bowlers bowling at 155+, while Tendulkar faced Lee & Akhtar. So express pace is certainly Tendulkar. Medium pace may be different.
No you are wrong , after 2020 NZ series he struggling against short balls so they bring him. And Smith was a freak against short balls before 2019 during 2015 ashes, he was smashing many boundaries to wood's short balls.No way this is correct.
In Ashes 2023, Sky Sports literally told us Smith's average (mid 30s) against deliveries bowled at 90 miles or more over his entire career. Thats why England would bring on Mark Wood as soon as he would come to the crease. So Sky commentary team was explaining why England was targeting Smith with Mark Wood.
No way this is correct.
In Ashes 2023, Sky Sports literally told us Smith's average (mid 30s) against deliveries bowled at 90 miles or more over his entire career. Thats why England would bring on Mark Wood as soon as he would come to the crease. So Sky commentary team was explaining why England was targeting Smith with Mark Wood.
So which one is correct? Cricviz vs sky sportsHow wily old Woakes had Australia on a string in the fourth Ashes Test
The loudest cheers were saved for Broad’s 600th Test wicket, but the all-rounder made the loudest impact with four timely scalps.indianexpress.com
I don't have premium subscription so if anyone can retrieve it, it'll be quite helpful. But you can see from the screenshot below
-->
View attachment 44788
This may be true after 2020 period.How wily old Woakes had Australia on a string in the fourth Ashes Test
The loudest cheers were saved for Broad’s 600th Test wicket, but the all-rounder made the loudest impact with four timely scalps.indianexpress.com
I don't have premium subscription so if anyone can retrieve it, it'll be quite helpful. But you can see from the screenshot below
-->
View attachment 44788
25 over his career seems impossible. Doesn't line up with the eye test either.How wily old Woakes had Australia on a string in the fourth Ashes Test
The loudest cheers were saved for Broad’s 600th Test wicket, but the all-rounder made the loudest impact with four timely scalps.indianexpress.com
I don't have premium subscription so if anyone can retrieve it, it'll be quite helpful. But you can see from the screenshot below
-->
View attachment 44788
Makes sense.He is head of cricviz
x.com
x.com
If I had to guess - the answer is somewhere in the middleSo which one is correct? Cricviz vs sky sports
who would you say are the fastest bowlers of the Fab 4 eraSachin. I think there are still questions on Smith
I think cricviz is correct.So which one is correct? Cricviz vs sky sports
61.66 sounds good.If I had to guess - the answer is somewhere in the middle