Johan
International Vice-Captain
Yeah who knows where he goes from here, big series in Australia would be the starting point to take yourself to another level.It's not. But of COURSE, Root isn't done yet. Who knows where his career will end up.
Yeah who knows where he goes from here, big series in Australia would be the starting point to take yourself to another level.It's not. But of COURSE, Root isn't done yet. Who knows where his career will end up.
For reference if both had Bradman length careers they’d have roughly 12/17 and 12/16 respectively.I honestly didn't realise their rate of 50s/100s was even remotely that close. Obviously, Sachin playing for much longer and doing better overseas tips things decisively in his favor.
We can learn much from the crabs.What's so so weird is how much he struggled vs India even while playing them mostly at home. 1994 fail. 1997 very good. 2002 fail but I'll excuse 2002 because he was coming back from breaking his elbow. 2006 fail. All this while crabby Shiv was making runs vs them.
give up on ChanderpaulWe can learn much from the crabs.
Give up on giving up on Chanderpaul.give up on Chanderpaul
Which series? I want to see that stats,Lara had the greatest series any batter ever had against Australia imo, even Sachin never reached the height of that series.
1999 Australia series, 7 innings, 546 runs @ 91 avg, three hundreds, all on bowling friendly pitches and the 153* is perhaps the best inning ever.Which series? I want to see that stats,
This is better than his sl series?1999 Australia series, 7 innings, 546 runs @ 91 avg, three hundreds, all on bowling friendly pitches and the 153* is perhaps the best inning ever.
He made more runs in SL series but I rate the Australia one higher because he singlehandedly won West Indies two games against the Invincible Australia.This is better than his sl series?
Yes. Three of the best tons in his career in three testsThis is better than his sl series?
Why no commentary available on ESPNcricinfo of 1999 seriesHe made more runs in SL series but I rate the Australia one higher because he singlehandedly won West Indies two games against the Invincible Australia.
Sri Lanka one is also absurd, 688 runs in 6 innings with three tons and at an average of 116 against Prime Murali on genuine rank turners when no other Windies batter was making anything.
Why no commentary available on ESPNcricinfo of 1999 series
dunno about that, but it's this seriesWhy no commentary available on ESPNcricinfo of 1999 series
Not just 3 of his best, arguably the BEST ever and another in the top 50 inarguably.Yes. Three of the best tons in his career in three tests
Wow 7 match odi series, now ODIs are totally dead..dunno about that, but it's this series
Australia tour of West Indies | 1999 Australia tour of West Indies | Live Score, Schedule, News
Check Australia tour of West Indies live score 1999, squads, match schedules, Australia tour of West Indies points table, fixtures, updates, photos, and videos on ESPNcricinfo.www.espncricinfo.com
the 2-2 drawn 4 tests
Also both Sachin and him were not very good vs NZ whose bowling was below EngWhat's so so weird is how much he struggled vs India even while playing them mostly at home. 1994 fail. 1997 very good. 2002 fail but I'll excuse 2002 because he was coming back from breaking his elbow. 2006 fail. All this while crabby Shiv was making runs vs them.
I’m not sure if this is racist or just stupidity.Why black and white?
Sachin 1st century in Eng as a teenager available as a Colorful vedio
it's just a little poor camera quality bro, and there is colour, the pitch/day was just greyishWhy black and white?
Sachin 1st century in Eng as a teenager available as a Colorful vedio
What went wrong with McGill?it's just a little poor camera quality bro, and there is colour, the pitch/day was just greyish