• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Who is the best since Bradman?

Who is Best since Bradman

  • Steve Smith

    Votes: 6 28.6%
  • Sachin Tendulkar

    Votes: 15 71.4%

  • Total voters
    21

sayon basak

International Captain
You aren't, really
Have you seen a test match, where the ball seaming like hell for around 50-60 overs.
I am sure, you haven't, else you would not have dare to say like this.
So you're claiming that didn't ever happen before this era? Are you really telling me that this days batters are doing a good job?
 

Coronis

International Coach
Unlike Viv, Smith hasn’t had a steep decline(so far)

Smith has played 98 out of 114 Tests against SENPA. Sobers played 38 out of 93 Tests against PIN. Sobers averages 23 against NZ in

Unlike Sachin, Smith has had a monster series. He has also reached a higher peak than him.

It is not entirely wrong to say Smith is the best since Bradman.

There is a chance he can end up as the best since Bradman.
The **** is going on with this site
 

Narayana

School Boy/Girl Cricketer
Here is a plot of overall bowling average (essentially the same as batting average, just with no balls and wides included) by year from 1990 onwards .

the seven years from 2018 to 2024 has had the lowest bowling average for a seven year span going all the way back to 1956-1962.

The fact that this recent decline (and indeed the increase in the 2000s) is a very distinct shift, rather than a gradual decline though should immediately indicate that there's a good chance that we're not just looking at an overall decline in batting standards.

If batting standards are getting worse, the average against spin outside of India should have dropped along with the pace average and it hasn't whatsoever. What has changed though is the effectiveness of seam bowling for three main reasons:

1- the wobble ball

2- kookaburra reinforcing their seam since 2020

3-Boards making more results-oriented pitches, perhaps because of the WTC.

Most of you will know about the wobble ball by now, but if not, it's deliberately holding the ball with a wide-fingered grip with seam cantered and therefore sending the ball down with the seam wobbling, meaning that the ball can move either way off the seam depending on the position the seam happens to be when the ball pitches. This is a very different technique to the one old-school seam bowlers (e.g. McGrath) would use where the goal was a bolt upright seam position.

Here is an article with much more details about it.

According to Widen cricket

This type of delivery has gone from being almost unknown before 2010 to being the stock ball of probably the majority of seam bowlers in tests nowadays.As a result, the amount of swing bowlers are getting on average has significantly decreased (since the goal of the wobble ball isn't to swing the ball) while the amount of seam movement has gone up (see that article for a source), and that's a bad thing for batters.

As as per the article, "Against a ball that moves 1.5 degrees or more in the air, batters, overall, average 26.70. But against balls that move off the pitch at least 0.75 degrees, only half the threshold for swing, the average hovers around 20".

These trends cannot be explained purely by a decline in batting performance.
 

Attachments

Narayana

School Boy/Girl Cricketer
@capt_Luffy hey, luffy, do you think I am a blind Sachin fan?
I am sure you are,
Else no one with 2 eyes will peak sachin ahead of Steve Smith.
Here is a plot of overall bowling average (essentially the same as batting average, just with no balls and wides included) by year from 1990 onwards .

the seven years from 2018 to 2024 has had the lowest bowling average for a seven year span going all the way back to 1956-1962.

The fact that this recent decline (and indeed the increase in the 2000s) is a very distinct shift, rather than a gradual decline though should immediately indicate that there's a good chance that we're not just looking at an overall decline in batting standards.

If batting standards are getting worse, the average against spin outside of India should have dropped along with the pace average and it hasn't whatsoever. What has changed though is the effectiveness of seam bowling for three main reasons:

1- the wobble ball

2- kookaburra reinforcing their seam since 2020

3-Boards making more results-oriented pitches, perhaps because of the WTC.

Most of you will know about the wobble ball by now, but if not, it's deliberately holding the ball with a wide-fingered grip with seam cantered and therefore sending the ball down with the seam wobbling, meaning that the ball can move either way off the seam depending on the position the seam happens to be when the ball pitches. This is a very different technique to the one old-school seam bowlers (e.g. McGrath) would use where the goal was a bolt upright seam position.

Here is an article with much more details about it.

According to Widen cricket

This type of delivery has gone from being almost unknown before 2010 to being the stock ball of probably the majority of seam bowlers in tests nowadays.As a result, the amount of swing bowlers are getting on average has significantly decreased (since the goal of the wobble ball isn't to swing the ball) while the amount of seam movement has gone up (see that article for a source), and that's a bad thing for batters.

As as per the article, "Against a ball that moves 1.5 degrees or more in the air, batters, overall, average 26.70. But against balls that move off the pitch at least 0.75 degrees, only half the threshold for swing, the average hovers around 20".

These trends cannot be explained purely by a decline in batting performance.
 

Attachments

DrWolverine

State Captain
I'd argue Hutton got less stat padding opportunities than Sachin/Sunny/Lara which balances it out for me.
Scoring centuries against great pacer(100+ wickets and average less than 25)

Hutton
1. 1947 - Miller & Lindwall
2. 1951 - Miller & Lindwall
3. 1953 - Lindwall, Miller & Davidson


Sunil Gavaskar
1. 1976 - Andy Roberts & Michael Holding
2. 1976 - Michael Holding
3. 1976 - Richard Hadlee(young)
4. 1978 - Imran Khan
5. 1978 - Imran Khan
6. 1980 - Imran Khan
7. 1983 - Imran Khan
8. 1983 - Roberts, Holding, Marshall & Garner
9. 1983 - Marshall & Holding
10. 1983 - Marshall & Holding

Sachin Tendulkar
1. 1992 - Donald
2. 1994 - Courtney Walsh
3. 1997 - Donald & Pollock
4. 1999 - Glen McGrath
5. 1999 - Akram & Waqar
6. 2001 - Glen McGrath
7. 2001 - Shaun Pollock
8. 2004 - Shoaib Akhtar
9. 2010 - Dale Steyn
10. 2010 - Dale Steyn
11. 2010 - Dale Steyn

Brian Lara
1. 1997 - McGrath
2. 1999 - McGrath
3. 1999 - McGrath
4. 1999 - McGrath
5. 2000 - McGrath
6. 2003 - Pollock
7. 2003 - Pollock
8. 2005 - McGrath

To say Hutton did not statpad unlike Gavaskar, Sachin or Lara is a joke.

Hutton never faced bowlers of the calibre of Gavaskar, Richards, Sachin or Lara.
 

shortpitched713

International Captain
Smith is still playing, and even accounting fir hard batting conditions his career is on a downward path.

I think he will not end up better than Sobers unless he has massive career resurrection.
 

Top