sayon basak
International Captain
Here's another question.Ok are you going to agree that Lillee is an ATG if he had a bowling average of 40.
Is Lohmann the greatest bowler ever?
Here's another question.Ok are you going to agree that Lillee is an ATG if he had a bowling average of 40.
Read my previous commentHere's another question.
Is Lohmann the greatest bowler ever?
See that's just silly, making up a number to justify stats. As I said, I rate Lillee by what I saw, so if your fake Lillee averaged 40 opening the bowling then I'm sure I wouldn't rate him as he would have been a crap bowlerOk are you going to agree that Lillee is an ATG if he had a bowling average of 40.
You are trying to defend your perception. Wasim had Waqar who was exceptional from 1990-1995 and Lillee had Thompson, Waqar was better than Thompson. So may be Lillee’s better stats in the top order was due to a weak bowling partner compared to Wasim.See that's just silly, making up a number to justify stats. As I said, I rate Lillee by what I saw, so if your fake Lillee averaged 40 opening the bowling then I'm sure I wouldn't rate him as he would have been a crap bowler
I'm not trying to defend my perception. I'm telling you I think other than overall records, or records during a specific period (eg. peak or decline) digging deep into stats is too easy to manipulate and/or just over thinking it.You are trying to defend your perception. Wasim had Waqar who was exceptional from 1990-1995 and Lillee had Thompson, Waqar was better than Thompson. So may be Lillee’s better stats in the top order was due to a weak bowling partner compared to Wasim.
didn't have the bottlecaps amp thoHe was, in much more suitable conditions and with better support fielders, to still end up with a lower overall average......
I don't think bottlecaps were really used in Tests and if they were, the reason only Imran was successful with them talks as welldidn't have the bottlecaps amp tho
I think they were used frequently in pak tbh, be it bottlecaps, or sandpapers, or just anything that gets the job done, away I think they didn't do it cuz they'd get caught easier.I don't think bottlecaps were really used in Tests and if they were, the reason only Imran was successful with them talks as well
(I will pretend I never said these things when I punch Imran due to Subz/a bowler I rate higher comes (I mean, Imran's home stats would be crazy given pitch bar cheating). But yeah, I do find the bottlecaps overplayed. Don't think they were used in Tests, except maybe in 83 India, when they literally carried the ball to dressing room.)
Use of the 1st bracket inside another 1st bracket in a Convo definitely deserves some attention.I don't think bottlecaps were really used in Tests and if they were, the reason only Imran was successful with them talks as well
(I will pretend I never said these things when I punch Imran due to Subz/a bowler I rate higher comes (I mean, Imran's home stats would be crazy given pitch bar cheating). But yeah, I do find the bottlecaps overplayed. Don't think they were used in Tests, except maybe in 83 India, when they literally carried the ball to dressing room.)
I am not trying to manipulate these pure statistics. You can do it with both these players and you will come up with same numbers. There is no Statistics that explains complete picture of these bowlers.I'm not trying to defend my perception. I'm telling you I think other than overall records, or records during a specific period (eg. peak or decline) digging deep into stats is too easy to manipulate and/or just over thinking it.
The only meaningful dig deep stat I can think of is how many wkts bowled, lbw, caught behind and caught in slips. Not meaningful for an overall rating but interesting
I never said thatThey don't show the full story either.
Samples this small are meaninglessBut the 6 Wickets he took in Pakistan and Sri Lanka are mostly top order wickets.
The only series I think they were definitely used was against NZ in 1990. Imran didn't play in that though.I think they were used frequently in pak tbh, be it bottlecaps, or sandpapers, or just anything that gets the job done, away I think they didn't do it cuz they'd get caught easier.
I gave already a huge sampleSamples this small are meaningless
And not to mention Wasim had Abdul Qadir, Mushtaq Ahmed and Saqlain Mushtaq bowling with old ball. Lillee had no one close to that brilliance with the ball when it comes to spin.You are trying to defend your perception. Wasim had Waqar who was exceptional from 1990-1995 and Lillee had Thompson, Waqar was better than Thompson. So may be Lillee’s better stats in the top order was due to a weak bowling partner compared to Wasim.
Still he should have annihilated Sri Lanka who were playing only their third test. He was not even threatening on a lively Asgiriya pitch.Samples this small are meaningless
This is a good point. Have to Agree.And not to mention Wasim had Abdul Qadir, Mushtaq Ahmed and Saqlain Mushtaq bowling with old ball. Lillee had no one close to that brilliance with the ball when it comes to spin.
It was a Spin bowlers pitch in Sri Lanka just saw the details of the match and Lillee in fact did a good job in that match. He dismissed 2 openers and a No 3 Batsmen which no other Australian pace bowler could do in that match and of course Sri Lankan bowlers were hammered by Australians in that match.Still he should have annihilated Sri Lanka who were playing only their third test. He was not even threatening on a lively Asgiriya pitch.
Fun stat, Vaas has taken 56 wickets in 14 matches at Asgiriya at 20.1. That is a proper fast bowling paradise.
Asgiriya is never a spin bowlers pitch. For one and half days it swings.It was a Spin bowlers pitch in Sri Lanka just saw the details of the match and Lillee in fact did a good job in that match.