• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Wasim Akram vs Dennis Lillee

Who was the greater bowler?

  • Wasim Akram

    Votes: 38 50.0%
  • Dennis Lillee

    Votes: 38 50.0%

  • Total voters
    76

Van_Sri

U19 12th Man
For Example : Wasim when he hit 257 against Zimbabwe he didn’t bowl in the 2nd innings due to fatigue this might effect his statistics. Here I am judging both of them purely as a Test Match Bowlers. But if you bring his batting abilities and his experience of bowling in sub continent. The conclusions will differ.
 

Qlder

International Regular
Ok are you going to agree that Lillee is an ATG if he had a bowling average of 40.
See that's just silly, making up a number to justify stats. As I said, I rate Lillee by what I saw, so if your fake Lillee averaged 40 opening the bowling then I'm sure I wouldn't rate him as he would have been a crap bowler 😉
 

Van_Sri

U19 12th Man
See that's just silly, making up a number to justify stats. As I said, I rate Lillee by what I saw, so if your fake Lillee averaged 40 opening the bowling then I'm sure I wouldn't rate him as he would have been a crap bowler 😉
You are trying to defend your perception. Wasim had Waqar who was exceptional from 1990-1995 and Lillee had Thompson, Waqar was better than Thompson. So may be Lillee’s better stats in the top order was due to a weak bowling partner compared to Wasim.
 

Qlder

International Regular
You are trying to defend your perception. Wasim had Waqar who was exceptional from 1990-1995 and Lillee had Thompson, Waqar was better than Thompson. So may be Lillee’s better stats in the top order was due to a weak bowling partner compared to Wasim.
I'm not trying to defend my perception. I'm telling you I think other than overall records, or records during a specific period (eg. peak or decline) digging deep into stats is too easy to manipulate and/or just over thinking it.

The only meaningful dig deep stat I can think of is how many wkts bowled, lbw, caught behind and caught in slips. Not meaningful for an overall rating but interesting

It would be hilarious if Akram had more catches behind the wicket (keeper + slips) than Lillee giving all the "bad fielding" excuses for why he only took 3.98 WPM compared to Lillee's 5.08 WPM 😄
 
Last edited:

capt_Luffy

International Coach
didn't have the bottlecaps amp tho
I don't think bottlecaps were really used in Tests and if they were, the reason only Imran was successful with them talks as well

(I will pretend I never said these things when I punch Imran due to Subz/a bowler I rate higher comes (I mean, Imran's home stats would be crazy given pitch bar cheating). But yeah, I do find the bottlecaps overplayed. Don't think they were used in Tests, except maybe in 83 India, when they literally carried the ball to dressing room.)
 

Johan

International Vice-Captain
I don't think bottlecaps were really used in Tests and if they were, the reason only Imran was successful with them talks as well

(I will pretend I never said these things when I punch Imran due to Subz/a bowler I rate higher comes (I mean, Imran's home stats would be crazy given pitch bar cheating). But yeah, I do find the bottlecaps overplayed. Don't think they were used in Tests, except maybe in 83 India, when they literally carried the ball to dressing room.)
I think they were used frequently in pak tbh, be it bottlecaps, or sandpapers, or just anything that gets the job done, away I think they didn't do it cuz they'd get caught easier.
 

sayon basak

International Captain
I don't think bottlecaps were really used in Tests and if they were, the reason only Imran was successful with them talks as well

(I will pretend I never said these things when I punch Imran due to Subz/a bowler I rate higher comes (I mean, Imran's home stats would be crazy given pitch bar cheating). But yeah, I do find the bottlecaps overplayed. Don't think they were used in Tests, except maybe in 83 India, when they literally carried the ball to dressing room.)
Use of the 1st bracket inside another 1st bracket in a Convo definitely deserves some attention.
 

Van_Sri

U19 12th Man
I'm not trying to defend my perception. I'm telling you I think other than overall records, or records during a specific period (eg. peak or decline) digging deep into stats is too easy to manipulate and/or just over thinking it.

The only meaningful dig deep stat I can think of is how many wkts bowled, lbw, caught behind and caught in slips. Not meaningful for an overall rating but interesting
I am not trying to manipulate these pure statistics. You can do it with both these players and you will come up with same numbers. There is no Statistics that explains complete picture of these bowlers.
 

subshakerz

Hall of Fame Member
I think they were used frequently in pak tbh, be it bottlecaps, or sandpapers, or just anything that gets the job done, away I think they didn't do it cuz they'd get caught easier.
The only series I think they were definitely used was against NZ in 1990. Imran didn't play in that though.

Otherwise was mostly scratching, roughing along the square and seam lifting.
 
Last edited:

Migara

International Coach
You are trying to defend your perception. Wasim had Waqar who was exceptional from 1990-1995 and Lillee had Thompson, Waqar was better than Thompson. So may be Lillee’s better stats in the top order was due to a weak bowling partner compared to Wasim.
And not to mention Wasim had Abdul Qadir, Mushtaq Ahmed and Saqlain Mushtaq bowling with old ball. Lillee had no one close to that brilliance with the ball when it comes to spin.
 

Migara

International Coach
Samples this small are meaningless
Still he should have annihilated Sri Lanka who were playing only their third test. He was not even threatening on a lively Asgiriya pitch.

Fun stat, Vaas has taken 56 wickets in 14 matches at Asgiriya at 20.1. That is a proper fast bowling paradise.
 

Van_Sri

U19 12th Man
Still he should have annihilated Sri Lanka who were playing only their third test. He was not even threatening on a lively Asgiriya pitch.

Fun stat, Vaas has taken 56 wickets in 14 matches at Asgiriya at 20.1. That is a proper fast bowling paradise.
It was a Spin bowlers pitch in Sri Lanka just saw the details of the match and Lillee in fact did a good job in that match. He dismissed 2 openers and a No 3 Batsmen which no other Australian pace bowler could do in that match and of course Sri Lankan bowlers were hammered by Australians in that match.
 
Last edited:

Migara

International Coach
It was a Spin bowlers pitch in Sri Lanka just saw the details of the match and Lillee in fact did a good job in that match.
Asgiriya is never a spin bowlers pitch. For one and half days it swings.

Sri Lanka played two pacemen and Ranatunga who was fast medium when he was 19.
 

Top