• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Lara Vs Ambrose

Lara Vs Ambrose


  • Total voters
    12
  • This poll will close: .

subshakerz

Hall of Fame Member
I do not really agree.

Ambrose exploited his strengths to his absolute maximum.
Mastery is about mastering your discipline.

Marshall mastered all the dimensions of fast bowling, from inswing, outswing, cutters, bouncers, etc. McGrath was similar as far as seam.

Tendulkar mastered all the dimensions of technical batting to a level nobody has IMO.

On top of that, those guys added a mental dimension to their game, planning and reading their opponents. That made they the absolute masters.

Ambrose? He had a particular skill of accurate corridor bowling which combined with his height and pace gave him a considerable advantage. But at no point did he really seek to add to his skillset, so his mastery was limited in range, nor combine it with mental outthinking of his opponents. Hence a lesser master and why IMO he became predictable and manageable with age.
 

DrWolverine

International 12th Man
I feel Ambrose would have been best suited for T20 and been a multi-millionaire if he played today.

Curtly Ambrose was literally impossible to score runs against in both tests and one day internationals and even at the end of his career he was so economical.
 

Prince EWS

Global Moderator
I feel Ambrose would have been best suited for T20 and been a multi-millionaire if he played today.

Curtly Ambrose was literally impossible to score runs against in the one day format and even at the end of his career he was so damn economical.
Garner moreso. And not even just for his batting.
 

DrWolverine

International 12th Man
Ambrose pre injury in one day cricket was taking 1.5WPM and was very economical.
IMG_7084.jpeg

Ambrose post injury in one day cricket compensated for his lack of wicket taking abilities to became the most difficult bowler to score runs against.
IMG_7082.jpeg
 

Prince EWS

Global Moderator
How did this Garner batting meme start?
...


Lol at picking Mcgrath over Garner. Garner is not only a marginally better bowler than Mcrath he is also a significantly better bat.

Also neither Pollock nor Kapil as a place in an All time XI

Garner, Warne, Akram, Hadlee + Flintoff/Klusener is a much better attack
Come on, not the best way to parse them
lmao at significantly better bat

I thought I'd seen it all on CW, but "pick Garner for batting" is a new one. Kudos.
 

Top