• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

**Official** 3rd Test @Brisbane (Ewwwww), 14th-18th December

Burgey

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Oh absolutely, but they should be shaped using rule changes (which I think should be considered) rather than umpires just randomly winging it
We used to have an umpire who just didn’t believe in the lbw law, and openly said so. Literally just refused to give them. Ever. It was mental. Lovely old bloke and everyone just accepted that was Reg and you played on. No one ever blew up because he was the same for everyone.

In hindsight it was hilarious, primarily because I used to open the batting
 

the big bambino

Cricketer Of The Year
We used to have an umpire who just didn’t believe in the lbw law, and openly said so. Literally just refused to give them. Ever. It was mental. Lovely old bloke and everyone just accepted that was Reg and you played on. No one ever blew up because he was the same for everyone.

In hindsight it was hilarious, primarily because I used to open the batting
Geez I reckon I’d have tested his patience.
 

Starfighter

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
DRS's greatest contribution - apart from getting more decision right obviously - is how much it's exposed a lot of previously feted umpires and umpiring practices as being far more interested in shaping preferred playstyles rather than actually enforcing the laws of the game
If English umpires had interpreted the 1935 rules correctly, we might never have ended up with two behind square rule. They refused to give out anyone padding up on the front foot, so bowlers reverted to leg theory like they did pre-1935 (the whole idea of the change being to encourage batsmen to use their bat to anything pitching outside off). It showed the batsman-centric nature of the game that bowlers nearly universally copped the blame for this.
 

honestbharani

Whatever it takes!!!
Only 7 or 8 boundaries in 40 overs of bowling shows we have been pretty relentless as a bowling unit. But I guess post lunch Jadeja will have to bowl one end if Siraj is not gonna be able to bowl. And NKR has to bowl a lot more. :(
 

Top