honestbharani
Whatever it takes!!!
I dont think the previous winners were the best sides in those periods either but just like the ODI WCs and even T20 WCs, it still shows they won a pressure game (finals). And that is how most trophies are contested anyways.Oh and I'm absolutely certain that whoever does win this WTC cycle is not necessarily going to be the answer to this thread question.
I understand the minus points of the current system but I still think having this instead of nothing is definitely better for world cricket overall. Will it ever be a proper league? I hope it does become so in the future and this is just a start. But even if it doesn't, the current iteration has definitely helped with dead rubbers and additional context for games and even ****ing overrates. Virat Kohli was seen addressing the team in the huddle before we bowled in the fourth innings at Perth and he was clearly heard to be talking about keeping up a good overrate so as to not lose WTC points. There are some genuinely good points about how the current penalty for overrates is not the best but again, for me, its a case of something is better than nothing, just like the WTC itself.