• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

**Official** 1st Test @ Perth, 22nd-26th November

Victor Ian

International Coach
What pisses me off about this team the most, is not the team but the preparation. They should always play all the lead up shield games so they might actually have a home advantage. Particularly, the bowlers. When is the last time they bowled in Perth. Pathetic ACB putting money over performance. I'd argue performance is the easiest path to money.
 

Qlder

International Debutant
What's even more worrying about this is that Australia will have fielded 7 of 9 sessions by end of day 3 (about 195 overs)

India on the other hand bowled only 27 overs on day 1 and 25 overs on day 2. So Indian bowlers are going to have some very fresh legs when a tired Australia bats again
 

Anthony Clayden

School Boy/Girl Cricketer
What pisses me off about this team the most, is not the team but the preparation. They should always play all the lead up shield games so they might actually have a home advantage. Particularly, the bowlers. When is the last time they bowled in Perth. Pathetic ACB putting money over performance. I'd argue performance is the easiest path to money.
Not sure it was the bowlers fault, the batsman failed.
 

hendrix

Hall of Fame Member
Dal is a terrible source of protein. It's a lot less bioavailable and you get a disproportionately high amount of carbs (and hence total calories) to match the protein content of one serving of chicken or beef. The protein quality index is a thing. Sure, you could supplement with protein powders but they're still a lot more expensive in the subcontinent. There's nowhere near enough protein in the Indian diet if you don't eat meat.
No, protein quality index is almost entirely irrelevant to muscle building. The "protein quality index" thing is an extremely flawed concept based on old data where people fed uncooked bean flour to pigs and used that to extrapolate things. It's far more nuanced, and frankly quite irrelevant

Amount rather than "quality" is relevant to muscle building
Higher dietary intakes of total, animal, and plant protein, regardless of the ratio of animal-to-plant protein, are associated with greater skeletal muscle mass in community-dwelling middle-aged and older Chinese adults with a mean protein intake above the current recommendation for protein of 0.8 g/kg per day
 

Top