-
Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.
Top 10 of every Sport
- Thread starter Thala_0710
- Start date
Red_Ink_Squid
Global Moderator
Not sure I'd have Flair if WWE only. If opening up to non-WWE the whole list gets much harder.
Other 9 names are solid. Might go Lesnar or Punk in Flair's spot
Edit: just remembered Rey. I'd pick Rey.
sledger
Spanish_Vicente
Yeah nearly went for Rey tbf. Considered Rock as well.
duffer
Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Some list is this
dontcloseyoureyes
BARNES OUT
Kobe is not a top 10 player.
OverratedSanity
Request Your Custom Title Now!
Mj
Lebron
Russell
Kareem
Magic
Duncan
Shaq
Bird
Hakeem
Wilt
Lebron
Russell
Kareem
Magic
Duncan
Shaq
Bird
Hakeem
Wilt
capt_Luffy
Cricketer Of The Year
How come Russell is that much ahead of Wilt while both played in the same era??
Out of all the players who have played basketball since it was created, he's not really very far ahead at all.
debraj72
Cricket Spectator
Why do you guys rate both of botvinnik,tal ahead of lasker?i mean,lasker was world number 1 for 25 years not only by being wcc champion, but also by chessmetric standards.lasker was also one of the greatest ever tournament player(greatest,if you believe alekhine)Botvinnik had a terrible record in wcc,he was also helped by Soviet administration.Tal was world champion for just 1 year.(If you say he was unorthodox,so was lasker).(Sorry nothing personal and apologies if i have committed any grammatical mistake)
Last edited:
Thala_0710
State 12th Man
Botvinnik is the literally the father of the Soviet school of chess. His impact on the game and the champions that followed out of Russia add to his legacy in addition to his own capabilities as a player.
Tal wasn't just unorthodox, Tal's prime and the way he outplayed the greats of his generation, made me put him over Lasker. Just going by objective strength, Lasker might go above both
capt_Luffy
Cricketer Of The Year
Pretty much this. Botvinnik was a pioneer and held the title for 15 years at a time with a plethora of great players around (yes briefly lost twice but reclaimed shortly). And well, Tal is pretty much my favourite player. He may have been the WC for only a year but his prime is comparable to the Big 3. Lasker does tends to go a little under the radar, mostly for his Era being an easier one. Don't think there is anything wrong in ranking this 3 in anyways.
dontcloseyoureyes
BARNES OUT
Because Russell's game won championships and Wilt's won personal accolades.
capt_Luffy
Cricketer Of The Year
No Di Stefano????
nightprowler10
Global Moderator
Ikki fuming somewhere aws.
Find it hard where to exactly rank him amongst the elites of the game hence I generally abstain from including him in such lists
capt_Luffy
Cricketer Of The Year
Why?? Di Stefano played in an era competitive enough and not too dissimilar to Pele.
I don't necessarily disagree but it feels a bit like the cricket equivalent of Ranji - Trumper as far as eras are concerned. And I'm just not able to have a consistent opinion on him with his prime coming in 'pre-Pele' era of football.
capt_Luffy
Cricketer Of The Year
Imo Andrade, Meazza and Sindelar is more akin to Ranji-Trumper. Di Stefano is more like Hobbs (and was more of a contemporary of Hutton). The most complete footballer ever imho.