He's clearly immature and/or unintelligent.Still have no idea why mcgurk feels the need to try and slap every ball for 6 to the legside in ODI's. He can score boundaries in the PP on both sides of the ground playing a few more conventional shots.
Maxwell without the talentHe's clearly immature and/or unintelligent.
What does the "entitled generation" mean?He's clearly immature and/or unintelligent.
I can't remember an international cricketer I enjoyed watching less. He is the embodiment of the entitled generation. His averages in every form of the game are absolutely diabolical. Makes Finn Allen look like Don Bradman
I heard some stories about him around Melbourne grade cricket. Those stories suggest he is both. But they're very much third hand.He's clearly immature and/or unintelligent.
Good summation. And yeah of course it's on the selectors. I think he'd even get the 'too much intent' tag from Baz McCullumMaxwell without the talent
The real problem is the selectors that keep picking him
Been told they're amazing all their lives, all about the adulation on social media, don't want to work hard enough to produce achievements of any real substance. Finn Allen is our version, and he's in a different league than Jake 'I average under 23 in four of the five formats I play, and 30 in the other' Fraser-McGurk.What does the "entitled generation" mean?
Bit harsh on inglis. People seem to forget that A. Allrounders take longer to figure out there game at all levels, particularly international cricket, and B. Keeper bat's are allrounders. Since the start of the covid shield bubble at KOR in AUS inglis has 7 fc hundreds at an average of 50+ and 1500+ runs. Similiar story of him only really figuring out List-A cricket in that 2019 period (don't have his domestic numbers for that, but it's a similiar picture. Same deal in ODI cricket, 25 @105 overall, but in the past 6 months it's 45 @125.Josh Inglis is another, we're just not used to Australia picking guys who are clearly not up to the level. Averaging 24 with a high score of 65 and batting at 4 for Australia is something I never thought I'd see.
That's fair, I haven't watched a lot of him outside of ODIs/T20Is against us and England, and Big Bash stuff. This is probably lazy, nostalgic stuff by me but you expect Australian No.4s and Australia WK/bats to have something about them...just don't feel like Josh Inglis is ever going to hurt you.Bit harsh on inglis. People seem to forget that A. Allrounders take longer to figure out there game at all levels, particularly international cricket, and B. Keeper bat's are allrounders. Since the start of the covid shield bubble at KOR in AUS inglis has 7 fc hundreds at an average of 50+ and 1500+ runs. Similiar story of him only really figuring out List-A cricket in that 2019 period (don't have his domestic numbers for that, but it's a similiar picture. Same deal in ODI cricket, 25 @105 overall, but in the past 6 months it's 45 @125.
Yeah and obviously that's tempered by the fact those guys have played F all ODI cricket, but it's not what you're used to from a team who wins World Cups as regularly as my post morning-coffee bowel movementSpeaking of poor ODI averages, I've never seen an Aussie side so low.
1. Short - 21.62
2. McGurk - 20.00
4. Inglis - 24.47
6. Hardie - 18.00
They're back up players with a handful of matches under their belt (samplesizelol). Really not that unusualYeah and obviously that's tempered by the fact those guys have played F all ODI cricket, but it's not what you're used to from a team who wins World Cups as regularly as my post morning-coffee bowel movement