• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

How would 80s WI and 2000s Australia fare in unbeatable current India?

capt_Luffy

capt_Luffy

Cricketer Of The Year
subshakerz said:
Yeah a what-if I don't engage in. You seen to mix that with calling it a miracle win by India.
Click to expand...
I never called it a miracle win lol. I called Gabba a miracle win with 7 of our primary bowlers and the best batsman missing. Eden is our Greatest (or 2nd greatest) win, that partnership was once in a lifetime, but I won't diminish that by calling it a miracle.
 
S

subshakerz

Hall of Fame Member
OverratedSanity said:
They were lucky they got to use their bench because the established dude who was a failure in India was missing. Don't try to weasel out of addressing it. You got proven wrong as usual and didnt remember that it was Clarke who came in for him not Lehmann, now admit it like a man instead of trying to change the topic with a "boohoo please dont disrespect daddy Australia :("
Click to expand...
No the reason I said it was Lehmann was because in the 4th test when Ponting came back from injury, it was him who exited the lineup. That is a reasonable way to deduce, no?
 
capt_Luffy

capt_Luffy

Cricketer Of The Year
subshakerz said:
No the reason I said it was Lehmann was because in the 4th test when Ponting came back from injury, it was him who exited the lineup. That is a reasonable way to deduce, no?
Click to expand...
Ignoring the context that Michael Clarke debuted and scored a vital century, it's reasonable. Now, by using your brains, it's lolworthy.
 
S

subshakerz

Hall of Fame Member
capt_Luffy said:
Ignoring the context that Michael Clarke debuted and scored a vital century, it's reasonable. Now, by using your brains, it's lolworthy.
Click to expand...
Whatever, none of this is a slight on Australia, just you boohooing that they had the bench strength to beat your team.
 
capt_Luffy

capt_Luffy

Cricketer Of The Year
subshakerz said:
You want to pretend McGrath missing out then was as bad as Tendulkar in 2004/5, go for it. I don't for a second think you believe it though.
Click to expand...
A Tendulkar with full fitness?? Yes. Especially given he pretty much was a beast again from 2006, when he no longer had those Tennis elbow issues.
 
honestbharani

honestbharani

Whatever it takes!!!
Its funny coz the only reason Aus ever won a series here is that the curator at Nagpur got salty at the then BCCI president and decided to take it out on his golden boy Ganguly. :laugh:

They would have drawn even that series had it not been for the stupid rain in Chennai. This inspite of that being our weakest side we put at home since 2000 and till at least about 2012-13. Salty hatez dem facts coz they dont suit his narrative. Another of his Trump moves. :p
 
S

subshakerz

Hall of Fame Member
honestbharani said:
They would have drawn even that series had it not been for the stupid rain in Chennai. This inspite of that being our weakest side we put at home since 2000 and till at least about 2012-13. Salty hatez dem facts coz they dont suit his narrative. Another of his Trump moves. :p
Click to expand...
Lol still blaming the rain when you were over 200 runs away.

Weakest side? Your own friends here say 2001 was a joke bowling attack without Srianth and Kumble.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Top