• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

*OFFICIAL* England in Pakistan 2024

Pothas

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
I see very little evidence of this so far personally. It's turned a bit but it's slow, slow turn, like yesterday.
That stat just there suggests otherwise.

It is always hard to tell though, things just look so much more frantic when wickets start falling and you get new batters in.
 

Spark

Global Moderator
But this is exactly why I was so interested in whether England's method would work on this sort of deck. Duckett showed that it can still work, but by the same token that's three top order bats out to hard-handed drives - exactly the sorts of shots which are so hazardous if the pitch is slow and inconsistent.

EDIT: Four - forgot Crawley.
 
Last edited:

Spark

Global Moderator
That stat just there suggests otherwise.

It is always hard to tell though, things just look so much more frantic when wickets start falling and you get new batters in.
Wasn't that just after tea, though? That doesn't feel like toss dependence so much as just the random variation you get in cricket in general. But yeah the franticness of wickets falling in clumps is just classic visiting-team-on-slow-turner, Misbah's team used to do this to sides all the time.
 

Top