Grow up? Mate, you're the one struggling to cope with his precious little list being critiqued.
Would normally agree with this, but if you post like it's a fact then it gets called out.This always cracks me up. If someone posts something of course it's their opinion, who else's would it be
I’m not? You started chucking a tantrum saying I was ignoring Anderson and when I explained my reasons for not selecting him (which were agreed to be valid by others) you accused me of being biased against him and didn’t even consider him and have been whinging ever since.
Pretty sure Molehill rates Cook and Broad as ATGs because of their runs/wickets tally lol
Broad absolutely is, David Warner agrees!!
Just trying to help you see sense, but I shall retire now as the lady is clearly not for turning…
Make me see sense… by saying an equal stat is better without any context.
Who said it was equal? He’s got 61 more wickets.
He’s only got 61 more wickets because he had the opportunity to play more because of English test spam.
Broad??
Using a Broad definition of ATG probably.
A WPM of 3.77 is not that freakish anyways
If 177 wickets at 21.39 between 35-39 is so unfreakish, why isn’t everyone doing it?
Doing it between 35-39 is unique but plenty of players have matched that average with a better WPM at a younger age.
Not doubting that, why I’m not advocating Anderson for any other age category.
What I said was correct
He played his last international at 31
Stuff me that's terrible maths from me.
The portion of his career, the "experts" on this forum ignore.
tbf, Anderson is a swing/seamer so it makes sense his WPM is a little lower, that doesn't take away from the fact he was difficult to hit and thus built preassure and the biggest plus of such bowlers being the ability to take out the top order batsmen, what's the wicket distribution of Anderson vs Cunmins by batting order?