SillyCowCorner1
Moooo
No way there's any bat on that
Glad it wasn't just me.Hahaha, the hawkeye didn't slant down the leg stump
And it is why those two earlier decisions seemed suspect to me. Naked eye, they looked out.That was plumb on first view for me, but why did the ball tracking go slightly left there
Surely that was hitting leg stump not middle?
Was in the car home from work, so missed them after catching most of the days play.And it is why those two earlier decisions seemed suspect to me. Naked eye, they looked out.
The first one looked very plumb, shocking when it was missing the stumps on HE. The second one at least looked like umpire's call.Was in the car home from work, so missed them after catching most of the days play.
But Cook was pretty confident the first one was out in TMS, surprised it was missing.
Got home as the second one occured and so didn't stop to hear Isa Guha thoughts as wanted to watch, by the time I turned the Tele on they were off for bad light
BBC 4 has an hour of highlights from 7pmWas in the car home from work, so missed them after catching most of the days play.
But Cook was pretty confident the first one was out in TMS, surprised it was missing.
Got home as the second one occured and so didn't stop to hear Isa Guha thoughts as wanted to watch, by the time I turned the Tele on they were off for bad light
Totally agree. I’m going to have to watch the highlights later to see them againThe first one looked very plumb, shocking when it was missing the stumps on HE. The second one at least looked like umpire's call.
Yeah this looks out. Not sure how that's missingThe first one looked very plumb, shocking when it was missing the stumps on HE. The second one at least looked like umpire's call.
The commentators on at that time, Broad and Ward, mention that because Holder was bowling from wide of the crease, so maybe that's why the extreme angle on HE was shown.Yeah this looks out. Not sure how that's missing