• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Hadlee Vs Viv Richards

Hadlee Vs Viv Richards


  • Total voters
    37

Migara

International Coach
Viv was a good captain. But not the Imran, Ganguly, Ranatunga or Lloyd level captain who changed the structure, mindset and out look of the teams radically.
 

kyear2

International Coach
Yeah going through his record shows Hadlee is a tad overrated.
I don't know about over rated, but he's a clear no. 3 for me as I've said for a while.

Don't think he's good as the top 2. Also Ambrose was right there with him prior to the shoulder injury
 

subshakerz

Hall of Fame Member
I don't know about over rated, but he's a clear no. 3 for me as I've said for a while.

Don't think he's good as the top 2. Also Ambrose was right there with him prior to the shoulder injury
Hadlee has similar issues to Ambrose in overall record but was more consistent.
 

kyear2

International Coach
You remember that. Good. We had a whole debate where I was trying to drive that point home.

I think I may have got you to even readjust Hadlee a bit also in your mind. He isn't as close to McGrath perhaps?
Your argument was that he wasn't effective and his average meant nothing. I still disagree with that, but he also wasn't the 3rd best bowler ever during that period other.

There's middle ground that you refuse to acknowledge.

Re Hadlee, I don't think he's especially close to Pigeon. Hence why it's a toss up as overall players which you skewered me for.
 

subshakerz

Hall of Fame Member
Yout argument WA that he wasn't effective and his average meant nothing. I still disagree with that, but he also wasn't the 3rd best bowler ever during that period other.

There's middle ground that you refuse to acknowledge.
I think prior to that there wasnt a general perception of the extent to which the 94 shoulder injury impacted his penetration. Folks were just reading series averages blindly.

Soon I will get you to accept that Hadlee also has a somewhat imbalanced record too.

After that, we'll see what we can do about McGrath.
 

kyear2

International Coach
I think prior to that there wasnt a general perception of the extent to which the 94 shoulder injury impacted his penetration. Folks were just reading series averages blindly.

Soon I will get you to accept that Hadlee also has a somewhat imbalanced record too.

After that, we'll see what we can do about McGrath.
And it was still a magnificent effort to keep his average whare it was, and he was still a brilliant bowler after.

Hadlee is already adjusted for what ever you're pushing. Hence I have McGrath as a clear no 2 for me. Hence when I said it's a toss up as overall players even factoring in Hadlee's batting, something you scoffed at.
 

subshakerz

Hall of Fame Member
And it was still a magnificent effort to keep his average whare it was, and he was still a brilliant bowler after.
Sure but I will take that as a begrudging acceptance of my argument.

Hadlee is already adjusted for what ever you're pushing. Hence I have McGrath as a clear no 2 for me. Hence when I said it's a toss up as overall players even factoring in Hadlee's batting, something you scoffed at.
I haven't seen you raise the point of Hadlee's heavy concentration of tests in a few areas before, though you have acknowledged it in this thread to your credit. Let's build in that.
 

Top