Starfighter
Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Quality camera work. Don't think it's hit him on the gloves though.
YepIt's because he walks in front of all three.
It's concerning that he thought that was down leg; fair enough to review on height but if he thinks it's down leg then he's lost his off stump.
Shaheen was a case of workload mismanagement which shouldn’t affect this dude since Pakistan don’t play many tests anywaysOr he might be decent for five minutes and then become awful. Pakistan isn't lacking in raw bowling talent but nurturing it so it grows rather than fades is their problem. Shaheen is showing a good example of this right now.
There are other formats of cricket and competitions going around that people do play - indeed, they are where Shaheen picked up his injuries.Shaheen was a case of workload mismanagement which shouldn’t affect this dude since Pakistan don’t play many tests anyways
No. I'm just asking the question.Oh, another one.
you must be unfamiliar with Skyliner’s shtickNo. I'm just asking the question.
Yeah we can laugh at Wilson getting another decision wrong but it looked like while it was kind of close as to whether it was in-line it was probably in line and looked plumb otherwise. And the Smith one looked 60/40 out live.Must admit I thought that was good night nurse for Usman. Pitch really looks like it's playing tricks now.
The intent of the LBW law is to stop batsmen jamming up games by simply standing in front of the stumps and using them as a risk free line of defence; that's less the case when the ball is delivered from wider and comes back in and hits outside the one.Yeah we can laugh at Wilson getting another decision wrong but it looked like while it was kind of close as to whether it was in-line it was probably in line and looked plumb otherwise. And the Smith one looked 60/40 out live.
On a semi-related note, why do balls need to be in-line of the stumps as well as hitting? It's something I've never quite understood.
Yeah still think that rule doesn't necessarily make total sense. Would be a huge change to cricket, specifically the balance between bat and ball, without it thoughThe intent of the LBW law is to stop batsmen jamming up games by simply standing in front of the stumps and using them as a risk free line of defence; that's less the case when the ball is delivered from wider and comes back in and hits outside the one.
Put simply, it would further encourage offspinners.Yeah still think that rule doesn't necessarily make total sense. Would be a huge change to cricket, specifically the balance between bat and ball, without it though
bro he has the 4th highest overs bowled among pacers in international cricket in the last 3 years and unlike the other 3 above him he also plays in multiple t20 leaguesThere are other formats of cricket and competitions going around that people do play - indeed, they are where Shaheen picked up his injuries.
Right but given the way the rule developed, it does make sense where they've landed. The 19th century version of the law required all of hitting the stumps, hitting in line and pitching in line and it had to be tweaked in favour of the bowler.Yeah still think that rule doesn't necessarily make total sense. Would be a huge change to cricket, specifically the balance between bat and ball, without it though