What if he felt Smith gloved it and stood there gormlessly watching it land right in front of him anyway?I reckon Brooks didn't see Smith glove it, and thought Stokes threw it away cause Stokes felt Smith didn't hit, so Brooks, thinking the same thing, followed Stokes' body language and didn't try to catch it
But man if Brooks felt Smith gloved and desperately dove and caught...that would have been amazing
Stokes career is written by a Hollywood scriptwriter, I'm convinced of it.Seriously, though, why even throw after a catch? I always thought that was a stupid and dangerous action. That it causes some people to end up with dropped catches but the habit persists is laughable.
I'm not sure how accurate this theory was, but I remember Warne used to say that you add two wickets and 20 runs to a score to see who's on top.Good recovery but as Spark said, these two has to get it to double figures
it would mean he is a NPC which is also very funnyWhat if he felt Smith gloved it and stood there gormlessly watching it land right in front of him anyway?
It's better tbhI missed it as I'm at work. Is it as bad as it sounds?
YepI missed it as I'm at work. Is it as bad as it sounds?
Yes.I missed it as I'm at work. Is it as bad as it sounds?
Near to South London update is cloudy, steady breeze, but no falling moisture as yet.
He also dropped the match at Edgbaston
Broad is too good for that and it's his last test.They will let him to review.one review left for eng
hope anderson wastes it somehow
Coincidentally I've just seen an ad for Meg3 - could it be the bloke who wrote that?Stokes career is written by a Hollywood scriptwriter, I'm convinced of it.