• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Is Ashwin an ATG spinner / player?

Flem274*

123/5
I think he is bowling at the level of greatness now but his side has robbed him of the opportunities to show us.

For a long while in his career he was ineffective in certain countries and I don't think many people disagree with that assessment, except perhaps for the extent of it (from complete liability to filler bowler).

I think he has shown enough in his late career (his tour of Australia and the first WTC Final spring to mind) to suggest he would bowl very well everywhere now but he isn't getting the chance to show it. Jadeja has been getting those opportunities and hasn't exactly disappointed with ball or bat overall, so its a bit of tough luck for Ashwin. His misfortune is sort of India's overall gain in that they can trust their pace bowling now (though they should have played both spinners more often).

The man is an instant win button in half the conditions he plays in, much like Dennis Lillee was for the pace bowlers. I don't think they are equivalent because Lillee barely got opportunities in some countries whereas Ashwin has had them in the past and performed poorly enough they are still held against him by Indian management, but an instant win button in 70% of Indian tests is always going to get a lot of games and be extremely valuable to his side.

I think Ashwin and Jadeja form the second greatest spin duo to ever play the game behind Murali and Herath, and in practice I'm not sure how often prime Murali and Herath played together, so Ashwin/Jadeja could be the best. They are the foundation of Indian near invincibility in subcontinental conditions over the past decade and you only have to look at home tests circa-2010 where everyone and their dog was giving them a fright while they fielded the likes of Harbhajan and Ojha to see the difference.

DRS and better conditions have played a strong hand in their success (and I support those changes for the good of the game), and I don't expect to see the duo rocking up to Oceania or South Africa and steamrolling in another universe, but its hard to diminish instant win buttons.

I think he's an entry level ATG, and only in ATG threads can that be viewed in a negative light. You take that for your side every time. The only thing he lacks is solid proof he can rock up to someone elses house and kick them in the head.

I also hope he gets mankaded in a world cup final and cries like the punishing humourless knob he is.
 

centurymaker

Cricketer Of The Year
It's not "a three-four" you braindead moron, in his last 2 tours of Australia, he's picked up 18 wickets at 27 on pitches where these days every visiting spinner gets murdered, and includes two test match wins in which he played a huge role. You were the one who brought up "impact". As good as Kumble was, his spells didnt lead to any wins. You will make me repeat it ad naseum but Ill do it again. He made Steve Smith, who's arguably the best since bradman, look completely foolish for two tests. His hold on him was one of the biggest factors factors in us winning the series.

Now shut the **** up. It's clear you didnt watch those games or are intentionally misremembering, because this nonsensical obsession with "Oh but where were the 5fers" makes no sense, it has nothing to do with actual real match impact which Ashwin had. It was one of the best series a spinner has had in Australia in ages. It is definitely "something to write home about". You complete simpleton.
Agreed and there's a reason why India got thrashed in the WTC Final...

On day 1, Aus were 100/4 at one stage too, but India were without a certain 'impactful' player (who also happens to be ranked 1)
 
Last edited:

honestbharani

Whatever it takes!!!
I think I already answered this earlier but with his more recent performances, I will go this way.

ATG Test cricketer - Yes.
ATG Test spinner - Probably yes, but mainly because the numbers aren't as many as seamers.
ATG Test bowler - Probably no.
 

Silver Line

U19 Debutant
It's 32. And I don't see why you are singling WI when you could choose another like Bangladesh? And his average would remain more or less the same.

Do u know how rounding works, should be glad im bothering to do it from 2015 where half his career is gone anyways

and why do you have bangladesh in it? When i took out WI and SL, it obv meant bang, afg, ire and zim are taken out
 

OverratedSanity

Request Your Custom Title Now!
The biggest reason India won the series in Australia 2018 or 2020 wasn't Ashwin by any means.
You are arguing against something I didnt say. I said he was one of the key contributors with the ball (which he was). I didnt say he was the best because it's a futile discussion, no **** you can make arguments for others as well. It took a miraculous team effort.

2020- It was Rishabh Pant's two knocks in Sydney and Gabba that absolutely forced the Aussies to go defensive and turned the series upside down. Ashwin got the better of Smith in first two tests( one of them India lost anyways) but he was clueless with bowl in third test - Sydney, where Jadeja picked 4 wickets and brought India back in the game( Aussies were 200-2 and then collapsed to 330 odd due to Jads). Bumrah and Siraj were equally standout as Ashwin.
The fact that even by your admission Ashwin, a finger spinner, managed to have as much impact in ****ing Australia as Bumrah, one of the best pace bowlers in the world, is testament to how good he was. The refusal by some on CW to acknowledge that is ridiculous. Spinners just don't do that down under. This isn't even getting into the fact that the one kinda subpar game he had with the ball, he played an epic match saving innings with the bat.

Any other cricketer does that in 3 consecutive tests in Australia, they'd get their dicks sucked off constantly by you *****.
 

Bolo.

International Captain
Kumble has a better record in SENA in terms of actual match impact. Not saying his record is great there but at least he has stepped up to the plate more often than Ashwin.

Ashwin has played nearly 100 games without taking a fifer there which speaks of how diminished a threat he is outside his comfy conditions. You can call it trivial if you want but nobody would call a batsman who hasn't scored a ton in these conditions a great.

He is a master in spinning conditions and against weak batting lineups.
Spinner 5 wicket hauls in unfavourable conditions against quality lineups are largely a function of bowling a lot of overs.

Look at the quality of the other bowlers in their respective sides, and figure out who had more opportunity to bowl in SENA.

How many 5 wicket hauls do you think Kumble would have got if playing in Ashwin's place? 1? Utter non-issue when looking at 100ish test careers.
 

Socerer 01

International Captain
You are arguing against something I didnt say. I said he was one of the key contributors with the ball (which he was). I didnt say he was the best because it's a futile discussion, no **** you can make arguments for others as well. It took a miraculous team effort.



The fact that even by your admission Ashwin, a finger spinner, managed to have as much impact in ****ing Australia as Bumrah, one of the best pace bowlers in the world, is testament to how good he was. The refusal by some on CW to acknowledge that is ridiculous. Spinners just don't do that down under. This isn't even getting into the fact that the one kinda subpar game he had with the ball, he played an epic match saving innings with the bat.

Any other cricketer does that in 3 consecutive tests in Australia, they'd get their dicks sucked off constantly by you ****s.
they suck Anderson’s dick for far less
 

ma1978

International Debutant
India also has much better pace bowlers I. ashwin’s era than Kumble. It’s a lot harder to get at a 5for when you have Shami, Siraj, Bumrah steaming in and taking wickets vs Agarkar, RP Singh and freaking Dodds Ganesh / Tiny Yohannan / Paras Mhambrey / Debashish Mohanty etc etc. when Kumble played in SENA, India was lucky to win a test. When Ashwin plays, we win two BGS. Wtf
 

Socerer 01

International Captain
Spinner 5 wicket hauls in unfavourable conditions against quality lineups are largely a function of bowling a lot of overs.

Look at the quality of the other bowlers in their respective sides, and figure out who had more opportunity to bowl in SENA.

How many 5 wicket hauls do you think Kumble would have got if playing in Ashwin's place? 1? Utter non-issue when looking at 100ish test careers.
i decided to see his checklist analysis and looked at Kumble’s so called famed 5fers in sena

two were on the 2003/04 tour where it was all flat and he bowled a lot and got 2 5fers. 1 was in a win but he took three tailenders wickets for it. Kumble’s efforts were valiant in that series but as already pointed out he didn’t get the team to a win where as Ashwin did in 2 series when the conditions are worse for spinners

the other 5fer was against a fresh readmitted south africa team in 1992
 

centurymaker

Cricketer Of The Year
much wow pls impress us with more genius logic
India also has much better pace bowlers I. ashwin’s era than Kumble. It’s a lot harder to get at a 5for when you have Shami, Siraj, Bumrah steaming in and taking wickets vs Agarkar, RP Singh and freaking Dodds Ganesh / Tiny Yohannan / Paras Mhambrey / Debashish Mohanty etc etc. when Kumble played in SENA, India was lucky to win a test. When Ashwin plays, we win two BGS. Wtf
This is the most important point. You can't take 5-fers when you have a top class pace attack taking a big chunk of the wickets. In Kumble's case, he had no competition. He had to end up with more wickets bowling countless overs.
 

centurymaker

Cricketer Of The Year
this Silver Line dude accusing others of stats manipulation is cute because its what he does in nearly every post of his to jump to conclusions and then apologize on the occasions he gets called out for it to continue doing it anyway
What do you expect from a P..........

He'd be the last people to admit that Ashwin is a borderline ATG bowler
 

Top