I don't think they are dodgy bowlers even (even though finger spinners only deserve to be in the pavilion on flat fast wickets!). Its more a case of how irrelevant the BQ number actually is versus the quality. It does not actually give a good indication from a stumped numbers point of view of the value of the bowler.Also, Winton and especially Teague really aren't that dodgy; it's more that FHK's bowling supreme quality really drags my side's BQs down.
Yeah, it was just a competitive two-click bid that happened to pay off. But his distribution (17–3–17!) was almost interesting enough to play him in the final lol. Can bat and captain, but it's tough to find a place in a lineup that already has a spare bowler, or two. Will offer him a couple of games as he goes just to see how that manic distribution pans out in terms of HRH BQ.@ataraxia just trying to flip Wilcox on the TM?
TMO? That's no good. Good that if you happen to trickle into danger territory then Todii rather than Davidson or Levy is first to be auto-booted, I guess.<$10000 in the bank after this weeks finance!
Since I tried to sell him Todii has actually been pretty gun... and I don't have an alternative wk! I believe that I get a week to recover? Hopefully between my div 3 winnings and moving into div 2 for T20 and ODI sponsorship goes up another spot to keep my head above water!TMO? That's no good. Good that if you happen to trickle into danger territory then Todii rather than Davidson or Levy is first to be auto-booted, I guess.
So when you bought Aqeel ad-Din for $799,338 I imagine $800,000 was your cap?Since I tried to sell him Todii has actually been pretty gun... and I don't have an alternative wk! I believe that I get a week to recover? Hopefully between my div 3 winnings and moving into div 2 for T20 and ODI sponsorship goes up another spot to keep my head above water!
yep....! Kalinga tried to snipe my snipe!So when you bought Aqeel ad-Din for $799,338 I imagine $800,000 was your cap?