You are mistaken, I believe. Shanto has always been a batsman who bowled rarely.okay i could be missing something but didn't shanto debut as a dreadfully poor fast bowler who they picked to bat low and bowl like four overs a game or am i mistaken on this one
You're just totally wrong and I can't even think who you might be confusing him with.okay i could be missing something but didn't shanto debut as a dreadfully poor fast bowler who they picked to bat low and bowl like four overs a game or am i mistaken on this one
You are probably thinking of Saifuddin or Shafiul. Those 2 are the closest to what you've mentioned.okay i could be missing something but didn't shanto debut as a dreadfully poor fast bowler who they picked to bat low and bowl like four overs a game or am i mistaken on this one
Mitchell StarcYou're just totally wrong and I can't even think who you might be confusing him with.
He is playing this test too. He doesn't bat though.i think i'm thinking of this guy, tricked by also having a three name name is my thinking
Shoriful Islam - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
He couldn't bat a hoop down a hill.He is playing this test too. He doesn't bat though.
18 wkts in 4 testHoping for a better second innings from Hamza here. Looked a much better bowler in his previous Tests than he did on Day 1 here.
the South African coach they had previously put a lot of emphasis on wanting better fast bowlers and conditions for them even at the cost of results, that may have turned their thinking with the newbie quicks coming throughI think ODI cricket has improved Bangladesh tremendously, it's opened the eyes to selectors that you can achieve great results if you invest in fast bowlers and now its rubbing onto Test Cricket
I know it takes time for things but we still lack a fast bowler who can bowl 145+ consistently. Its not a mandatory criteria but would have been nice to have one in the pipeline.I think ODI cricket has improved Bangladesh tremendously, it's opened the eyes to selectors that you can achieve great results if you invest in fast bowlers and now its rubbing onto Test Cricket
Taskin doesn’t bowl that quick? Or Ebadot?I know it takes time for things but we still lack a fast bowler who can bowl 145+ consistently. Its not a mandatory criteria but would have been nice to have one in the pipeline.
Was that Langeveldt? Or the White Lightning?the South African coach they had previously put a lot of emphasis on wanting better fast bowlers and conditions for them even at the cost of results, that may have turned their thinking with the newbie quicks coming through
Well, for Taskin it depends on how loosely you define 'bowl'. Ebadot isn't that quick.Taskin doesn’t bowl that quick?