Molehill
Cricketer Of The Year
Decent knocks from Livingstone and Jitesh, but Archer is a million miles from the bowler he was.Archer is taking a licking here.
Decent knocks from Livingstone and Jitesh, but Archer is a million miles from the bowler he was.Archer is taking a licking here.
You ruined his career.Genuinely I don't know. You keep @ing me about him but why would I remember someone I think is a spud from like one match ffs
Personally I hate how Arshdeep was good and then Athlai casually claimed he sucks and he’s been a bit puss since
Nah as you can see from the Daemon post, he was good when you said it.I probably said that cos he already sucked
In the context of a 200+ match, you'd think that Short's horrific knock would get him dropped for the next game and Raza come back in. It turned out to be the difference. It's one thing getting out cheaply, but hanging around for a run a ball 25 is far worse.Is raza injured? He's the impact sub this game but I can't think of any other reason punjab would drop him after he clutched them last game with the bat.
I just wish they would be somewhat consistent with their selection. I have no issues with Ellis over rabada yesterday because Dhawan explicitly said that decision was based on the matchup Ellis had vs some of the MI bats.In the context of a 200+ match, you'd think that Short's horrific knock would get him dropped for the next game and Raza come back in. It turned out to be the difference. It's one thing getting out cheaply, but hanging around for a run a ball 25 is far worse.
Daemon was wrong as usual imo
It's clear it's having a big difference on totals. They've already gone well past the record for the total number of 200+ scores in a whole IPL and we're barely past halfway. Having an extra bowler seems to make little difference, in fact, it often seems to leave the best bowler an over short as the skipper has too many options. But on flat pitches, the extra batter is just giving more license to attack and it's seemingly favouring the teams chasing. A lot of 200 plus scores are getting chased down, and often with some comfort too (see yesterday).Guys let's focus i don't like this impact sub to be involved in any format of cricket, like it should be a 11 vs 11 cricket game.
Thanks mateGood to see you back on the forum Athlai
I like the idea of allowing injury subs though. And the idea of naming your 11 after the toss. Those should be brought into all cricket and this impact sub nonsense should be abolished ASAP.It's clear it's having a big difference on totals. They've already gone well past the record for the total number of 200+ scores in a whole IPL and we're barely past halfway. Having an extra bowler seems to make little difference, in fact, it often seems to leave the best bowler an over short as the skipper has too many options. But on flat pitches, the extra batter is just giving more license to attack and it's seemingly favouring the teams chasing. A lot of 200 plus scores are getting chased down, and often with some comfort too (see yesterday).
So yeah, I don't like it either. It should be 11 v 11 not 12 v 12.