They do because of her brut force and sheer disdain combined with her timing.Even though I've seen her play a few of these innings, they still amaze me every time.
And now it seems even stranger.This seems strange.
Gujarat Giants couldn't obtain medical clearance for Dottin before deadline
Giants had earlier said Dottin was "recovering from a medical situation" and she had tweeted saying, "I'm recovering from nothing"www.espncricinfo.com
On a good batting pitch, one team scored 178 and it was chased down with a ball to spare. Doesn't that suggest that they've got things about right?I know it's becoming a broken record at this point but these boundary sizes are not fit for purpose.
It's just kind of patronising that we have players who can hit it 90+ and we have 45m boundaries. Some of those sixes by Grace Harris were not cleanly hit by her standards at all and were still sailing way over the fence into empty grass beyond.On a good batting pitch, one team scored 178 and it was chased down with a ball to spare. Doesn't that suggest that they've got things about right?
But isn't that similar to the men's game? The most powerful (of which Harris is clearly one) can mis-hit it for 6 too. There still seem to be plenty being caught on the ropes, if you make them any longer then we'll see more wickets and less runs. I could understand it if we were seeing 220-2, but 178-6 v 181-7 seems a pretty fair balance between bat and ball.It's just kind of patronising that we have players who can hit it 90+ and we have 45m boundaries. Some of those sixes by Grace Harris were not cleanly hit by her standards at all and were still sailing way over the fence into empty grass beyond.
I'm not saying it should be normalised completely, but the case for the current boundary size regulations was already looking thin five years ago and there's way more power hitting in the game now than there was then.
Well I think the balance is all wrong in men's cricket too. The balance being better in international women's ODIs in particular is precisely what makes them so enjoyable for me. It seems to be a problem unique for this tournament to me; I don't remember anything like this kind of thumb being put on the scale in favour of boundary hitters in internationals or the WBBL.But isn't that similar to the men's game? The most powerful (of which Harris is clearly one) can mis-hit it for 6 too. There still seem to be plenty being caught on the ropes, if you make them any longer then we'll see more wickets and less runs. I could understand it if we were seeing 220-2, but 178-6 v 181-7 seems a pretty fair balance between bat and ball.
I think they've been stretched from where they were. I can remember going to the Ageas 7 years ago and all the crowd were on one side of the ground because the boundary on the other side was so far in.
Gardner, Harris, McGrath... it's getting to be a fair list.Tryon, Healy and Devine deserve men's boundaries tbh.
Devine was something else the other night. Her brut power even in her ground strokes was astonishing.Tryon, Healy and Devine deserve men's boundaries tbh.
I'd be more looking into a lack of competitiveness at the start of the tournament together with flat pitches rather than the boundaries. Delhi and Mumbai were streets ahead, I'm not sure why, but they were. Up Warriors have improved significantly as the pitches have worn and brought their spinners into play.Am more baffled that they are scoring 180s and 200s with ease. 140-160 scores are what makes the games interesting but hate how this WPL has turned out in terms of high scores.
Of the 6 names mentioned, none of them play for the top 2 teams in the Tournament. If there is a cheat code, it's not playing out here. The match between yesterday's big 2 was won by an exceptional bowling performance from Delhi which made for an easy chase (as Lanning highlighted).Gardner, Harris, McGrath... it's getting to be a fair list.