I agree, but that's not what you said. You said players were over- and under-rated specifically to keep the cricket business going, as if it'd die if players were rated accurately and there was a plot to ensure that didn't happen.
If you think these are bad posts thats fine i won't make it because this is not my Personal Forum.
The king is back ??
yeah i made every round with 3 Test Series so that a Team won't reach final by Luck. So as you said Lord's will be the best Venue for Australia vs England so see a much more exciting Round.
Surely 1 v 8, 2 v 7, 3 v 6, 4 v 5 is fairer
Rigging the draw to have India play Pakistan in the first round is accurate though.
There are flaws in this type of format. However, i choose this format as Cricket Fans can see their Traditional Rivals going head to head against each other and Cricket fans should not feel disappointed that they could not see certain match-up at the end of the Tournament.
We will go with this format
Looks fair as there is a Neutral Venue too
Do you purposely want England to lose? Much better choice:
Verity instead of Underwood imo
I'd play 4 fearsome quicks and hunt as a pack. Sobers and Viv can cover the slow bowling, so Garner for Gibbs.
