Must've read next day's newspaper right? LolololololI read years back Bradman and Sid Barnes both made 234 against India in Sydney.
If Australia get these runs and make it 2-1 it'll be Axar so far the MAJOR difference due to him being involved in crucial partnerships in both the 1st & 2nd test when India were in trouble.Hard to like Axar and Jadeja. Both as bowlers are so protected as a species. Like allowing Rhinos, Giraffes, Meerkats and Lions to get a restraining order against Glenn McGrath
You still may if you take three really quickly and panic sets in. Problem is if one bloke gets 30 chasing this sort of target it’s basically doneif we had kuldeep i would back us to defend this total
No one saw that coming lolMust've read next day's newspaper right? Lololololol
Gill, for sure. Was excellent at giving up a wicket.siraj vs gill who played the shot better today
Exactly why I think they should open with Starc with a license to slog as many off the total as possible. He's not making any runs down at #8 anyway, might as well see what you can chip off before the real task beginsYou atill
May if you take three really quickly and panic sets in. Problem is if one bloke gets 30 chasing this sort of target it’s basically done
Yeah it feels like the trash tier tail vs: having three #7s is the real difference between the sides. Otherwise they seem pretty evenly matched.If Australia get these runs and make it 2-1 it'll be Axar so far the MAJOR difference due to him being involved in crucial partnerships in both the 1st & 2nd test when India were in trouble.
Yes,India's bowlers have given Australia diarrhea throughout the tour but Axar broke their hearts and turned the series around with the bat.
How was meeting President Coolidge old man hahaNo one saw that coming lol
Elegance I would say Gill, game nous and sheer ambition, definitely Sirajsiraj vs gill who played the shot better today
Yeah the problem is that there's absolutely zero margin for error here. The wicket is doing enough that India have a glimmer of hope, but they need to play perfectly and hope Australia really choke.You still may if you take three really quickly and panic sets in. Problem is if one bloke gets 30 chasing this sort of target it’s basically done
Going back to Athens in July to see my old mate SocratesHow was meeting President Coolidge old man haha
Time for Head to slap some quick boundaries tomorrow
Should probably have been playing for his spot 12 months ago. **** me, people **** on about Kane being a htb and a minnow basher but at least he still gets on the scoreboard some of the time.I actually think a 2-2 series would've the perfect result for India long term. Not quite disastrous enough to be a stain on Indian cricket's history, but disastrous enough to ensure some of the passengers finally get binned for good.
Kohli should probably be playing for his spot in the team in the 4th test.
Eh if it was 110-120id say India have a small chance. 75 is a miserable target that probably wouldn't be defended on an early 1900s sticky.Yeah the problem is that there's absolutely zero margin for error here. The wicket is doing enough that India have a glimmer of hope, but they need to play perfectly and hope Australia really choke.
Yeah. Minefields give the weaker team a chance. Becomes more of a lottery.That's how many teams have won tests here over the years
Lol that's fair.Should probably have been playing for his spot 12 months ago. **** me, people **** on about Kane being a htb and a minnow basher but at least he still gets on the scoreboard some of the time.