• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

*Official* 2022 New Zealand Tour of England, Ireland, Scotland & Netherlands

Uppercut

Request Your Custom Title Now!
I mean, this is true, but there's a reason you pick six specialist batsmen, not four.
Yeah that happens in almost every series.

I just think that when you set this England team chases of 280 and 300 you don't expect to lose both tests. Jamieson going down injured mid-test was a major blow, maybe we're not cutting them enough slack for that.
 

Flem274*

123/5
Yeah that happens in almost every series.

I just think that when you set this England team chases of 280 and 300 you don't expect to lose both tests. Jamieson going down injured mid-test was a major blow, maybe we're not cutting them enough slack for that.
You're cutting too much slack imo.

England might still have won because they've played really well but the first ports of call for NZ should be the top 4, dozy bowling plans and bizarre selection rather than bad luck or anything.
 

Flem274*

123/5
But you would still expect that those other 4 would be half decent at some stage on the tour... even if they don't dominate.
Yeah exactly. You don't build series wins on the lower middle order bailing you out. I'm sure there's exceptions but guys bat top 4 for a reason. They're usually the best batsmen in the team.
 

Meridio

International Regular
Ah ffs. Again, feels harsh to criticise someone who's batted this well...but two balls before lunch? Really?
 

straw man

Hall of Fame Member
You're cutting too much slack imo.

England might still have won because they've played really well but the first ports of call for NZ should be the top 4, dozy bowling plans and bizarre selection rather than bad luck or anything.
The clear exception to the 'but NZ still made a good score even if the top order failed' is the first innings of the first test where we were bowled out for 132. Only kept the match alive due to bowling plus England imploding.

That was the exception though - in general the bowling and catching has been the problem more than the batting - that and the general malaise affecting the side.
 

Top